HIGH 8.1

CVE-2026-2467: RTI Connext Professional Heap Buffer Overflow (CVSS 8.1)

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in RTI Connext Professional's core libraries that allows authenticated users to overflow variables and tags in memory. An attacker with valid credentials can trigger this flaw to corrupt data or crash the application, but cannot directly read sensitive information. The vulnerability affects multiple versions of Connext Professional spanning several major releases.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 8.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-122
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-17 / 2026-07-08

NVD description (verbatim)

Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in RTI Connext Professional (Core Libraries) allows Overflow Variables and Tags.This issue affects Connext Professional: from 7.4.0 before 7.7.0, from 7.0.0 before 7.3.1.3, from 6.1.0 before 6.1.*, from 6.0.0 before 6.0.*, from 5.3.0 before 5.3.*, from 5.0.0 before 5.2.*.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-2467 is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in RTI Connext Professional core libraries. The vulnerability stems from improper bounds checking when processing variables and tags, permitting an authenticated attacker to write beyond allocated heap memory. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H) indicates network accessibility with low attack complexity; authentication is required, but no user interaction is necessary. The flaw carries a HIGH severity rating with impact primarily on integrity and availability.

Business impact

RTI Connext Professional is widely deployed in real-time data distribution systems across automotive, aerospace, defense, and industrial IoT sectors. A successful exploit could cause denial of service by crashing critical middleware, or modify data in transit, leading to application instability and potential cascading failures in time-sensitive systems. Organizations relying on Connext for mission-critical messaging face operational risk until patching is completed. The authentication requirement limits the threat surface to insider threats and compromised client certificates.

Affected systems

RTI Connext Professional versions are vulnerable across a broad range: 7.4.0 through 7.6.x, 7.0.0 through 7.3.1.2, 6.1.0 through 6.1.x, 6.0.0 through 6.0.x, 5.3.0 through 5.3.x, and 5.0.0 through 5.2.x. Organizations must check their installed version number against RTI's advisory to determine exposure. Any deployment using core libraries from these ranges requires assessment and patching.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires valid authentication credentials to connect to an RTI Connext domain. This significantly restricts attack surface compared to unauthenticated network flaws. However, within environments where credentials are shared, compromised, or where authentication is weak, the low attack complexity means an attacker with access can trigger the overflow without specialized knowledge or user interaction. The flaw is not yet listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, suggesting limited real-world exploitation activity at publication.

Remediation

RTI Connext Professional users must upgrade to patched versions: 7.7.0 or later for the 7.x branch, 7.3.1.3 or later for 7.0–7.3, and corresponding patched versions for 6.x and 5.x branches. Verify exact patch versions in RTI's official security advisory before deployment. Organizations unable to patch immediately should restrict network access to Connext domains and enforce strong authentication controls on client certificates.

Patch guidance

Check your RTI Connext Professional version via the DDS administration console or version command. Cross-reference against the affected ranges provided. Download patches directly from RTI's support portal using your service contract credentials. Test patches in a staging environment that mirrors production topology before production deployment. For 7.x deployments, prioritize upgrading to 7.7.0 or later; for 6.x and 5.x, follow RTI's specific guidance on available patch versions for your release branch. Document patch application and maintain audit trails.

Detection guidance

Monitor for unexpected process crashes or terminations in Connext middleware components; heap corruptions often manifest as segmentation faults or access violations. Enable Connext debug logging to capture buffer operations. Network IDS/IPS rules should flag malformed DDS messages targeting variables and tags if signatures become available. Inspect authentication logs for successful connections from unexpected clients or unusual patterns. Heap overflow attempts may appear as memory corruption errors in system logs preceding application crashes. Establish a baseline of normal Connext behavior for comparison.

Why prioritize this

Although not yet in active public exploitation, this HIGH-severity vulnerability combines authenticated network access with guaranteed denial-of-service and data integrity impact. Organizations running Connext Professional in real-time systems where availability is critical should prioritize patching. The wide version range affected means legacy deployments are at particular risk. The authentication requirement provides a window for defensive measures, but should not delay patch planning.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 8.1 HIGH rating reflects the high impact on data integrity and availability (I:H, A:H), combined with low attack complexity and network accessibility. The requirement for prior authentication (PR:L) prevents the score from reaching CRITICAL, but the lack of confidentiality impact does not diminish the operational threat. In environments with weak credential management or insider risk, effective severity may be higher.

Frequently asked questions

Can this vulnerability be exploited without authentication?

No. The CVSS vector explicitly requires PR:L (privilege level: low), meaning valid authentication credentials are mandatory. An attacker must successfully authenticate to an RTI Connext domain before triggering the heap overflow. This significantly constrains the threat surface to authorized users or those who have compromised valid credentials.

What versions of RTI Connext Professional should I prioritize for patching?

Verify your current version first. If you are running 7.x, upgrade to 7.7.0 or later as a priority, as this is the most current branch. If on 7.0–7.3, upgrade to 7.3.1.3 or later. Legacy versions (6.x, 5.x) require patching to their respective fixed versions. Consult RTI's security advisory for the exact patch version available for your branch, as not all legacy versions may receive patches.

Is this vulnerability currently being exploited in the wild?

No. As of the publication date, this vulnerability is not listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no confirmed active exploitation in the wild. However, this does not guarantee future safety; organizations should treat this as a high-priority patch regardless and not wait for exploit confirmation.

What should I do if I cannot patch immediately?

Implement compensating controls: restrict network access to Connext domains using firewall rules, limit connections to trusted client IP ranges, enforce mutual TLS (mTLS) with strong certificate validation, and monitor authentication logs for anomalies. Isolate critical Connext deployments on segmented networks. These measures reduce attack surface while patches are staged and tested. However, patching remains the only true fix; compensating controls are temporary.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes and is based on available vulnerability data as of the publication date. Organizations must verify all patch versions, affected systems, and remediation steps against RTI's official security advisory before taking action. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of this assessment. Actual risk and exploitability may vary based on network architecture, authentication controls, and deployment specifics. Consult with RTI support or your security team for environment-specific guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-27. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).