CVE-2026-22283: Dell PowerFlex Manager Unauthenticated Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Dell PowerFlex Manager versions before 5.1.0.1 contain a vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to disclose sensitive information. The flaw stems from the inclusion of functionality from an untrusted control sphere—essentially, the product incorporates code or resources from an unvetted source that an attacker can manipulate to bypass security controls and access confidential data. While exploitation requires user interaction (a user must be present or perform an action), no authentication is needed, making this a meaningful risk for organizations running affected PowerFlex Manager instances.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-829
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-17 / 2026-06-25
NVD description (verbatim)
Dell PowerFlex Manager, version(s) prior to 5.1.0.1, contain(s) an Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-22283 is classified under CWE-829 (Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere). The vulnerability exists in Dell PowerFlex Manager prior to version 5.1.0.1. The attack vector is network-based, and while the attack complexity is marked as high, the user interaction requirement and lack of authentication requirement indicate the vulnerability can be triggered remotely by an unauthenticated party. The consequence is primarily confidentiality impact (information disclosure), though the CVSS vector also reflects integrity and availability concerns, suggesting the vulnerability's scope may extend beyond simple data leakage depending on the context of exploitation.
Business impact
Information disclosure in PowerFlex Manager could expose sensitive infrastructure data, including storage configuration, credentials, or operational details critical to data center environments. For organizations managing large-scale storage environments via PowerFlex, compromise of the management interface undermines the confidentiality guarantees of the entire managed infrastructure. The lack of authentication requirement increases business risk by lowering the barrier to exploitation, though the high attack complexity requirement provides some operational friction.
Affected systems
Dell PowerFlex Manager versions prior to 5.1.0.1 are affected. Organizations should inventory their PowerFlex Manager deployments and determine current version status. The vulnerability does not affect later versions, so patching is the definitive mitigation path.
Exploitability
Exploitation is possible for an unauthenticated remote attacker but requires high attack complexity and user interaction, meaning the attack is not trivial and typically requires luring or tricking a user into a specific action or state. This moderates the immediate, widespread exploitation risk compared to vulnerabilities that are immediately exploitable without user involvement. However, the lack of authentication requirement remains a significant factor; attackers need not compromise credentials or assume an authenticated role.
Remediation
Update Dell PowerFlex Manager to version 5.1.0.1 or later. Organizations unable to patch immediately should evaluate compensating controls: restrict network access to the PowerFlex Manager interface to trusted administrative networks, implement rate-limiting and monitoring on management endpoints, and review access logs for anomalous activity. Given the information disclosure risk, consider whether sensitive data processed by PowerFlex can be further isolated or encrypted at rest.
Patch guidance
Dell has released version 5.1.0.1 to address this vulnerability. Refer to the Dell PowerFlex security advisories for specific patching procedures, as they may include prerequisites, rollback considerations, or staged deployment recommendations. Testing patches in a non-production environment before production deployment is strongly advised, particularly for critical infrastructure components like storage management systems.
Detection guidance
Monitor for unusual remote access attempts to PowerFlex Manager, particularly from unexpected source IPs or during off-hours. Log analysis should flag any failed authentication attempts followed by successful connections, or suspicious user-agent strings. Implement network-based detection rules triggered by abnormal request patterns to the PowerFlex Manager API or web interface. Also monitor for unexpected data exfiltration from the PowerFlex Manager host, since successful exploitation results in information disclosure.
Why prioritize this
Although this vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 7.5 (HIGH), several factors influence real-world priority: the requirement for high attack complexity and user interaction reduces immediate exploitability compared to network-adjacent vulnerabilities; however, the unauthenticated nature means attackers can probe and trigger the condition without prior compromise. For organizations where PowerFlex Manager is exposed to the internet or untrusted networks, this warrants immediate patching. For those with well-segmented management networks, prioritization can be slightly deferred but should remain high on the patch schedule.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects: (1) network attack vector, increasing reach; (2) high attack complexity, reducing likelihood; (3) no privilege requirement, lowering the bar for attackers; (4) user interaction required, introducing friction; and (5) high confidentiality impact with collateral integrity and availability implications. The score balances significant information disclosure risk against the technical barriers to successful exploitation. This lands the vulnerability firmly in the HIGH severity tier, warranting timely remediation across all affected instances.
Frequently asked questions
Can we exploit this vulnerability without user interaction?
No. While the vulnerability is remotely exploitable and requires no authentication, the CVSS vector indicates user interaction is required, meaning an attacker must trick or induce a user to perform a specific action or be in a particular state. This is a material control that reduces the risk of mass, automated exploitation.
Does PowerFlex Manager require internet exposure, or is this an internal-only concern?
PowerFlex Manager is a management interface typically deployed in internal data center networks. However, many organizations expose management interfaces remotely for administrator convenience. If your instance is internet-facing or accessible from untrusted networks, patch urgently. If it is strictly segmented on a trusted management VLAN with restricted access, you have more flexibility to plan patching windows, though prioritization should remain high.
What information could an attacker access by exploiting this flaw?
The vulnerability leads to information disclosure, which in the context of a storage management system could include storage pool configurations, snapshot schedules, replication settings, or potentially credentials and API tokens stored in the manager. The exact scope depends on what data the untrusted functionality exposes. Review the Dell advisory for specifics and assess what sensitive data your PowerFlex infrastructure handles.
Is there a workaround if we cannot patch immediately?
There is no substitute for patching, but interim mitigations include: restricting network access to PowerFlex Manager to a whitelisted set of trusted administrator IPs, implementing a VPN or jump host requirement for remote access, disabling any features known to trigger the vulnerability if Dell guidance specifies them, and heightening log monitoring for suspicious activity. However, these are temporary measures only; patching should be treated as the primary remediation.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes to assist security leaders in risk assessment and remediation planning. It is not a substitute for vendor advisories or independent security testing. Organizations should verify patch availability, compatibility, and deployment impact with Dell before implementing updates in production. The information provided herein is accurate as of the publication date but may be superseded by official vendor guidance or subsequent security research. Exploit techniques or proof-of-concept code are not provided herein; security teams should rely on responsible disclosure practices and vendor-coordinated vulnerability management. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-27. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2022-49036HIGHSynology Active Backup for Business Recovery Media Creator Arbitrary Code Execution
- CVE-2022-49042HIGHSynology Hyper Backup Explorer Arbitrary Code Execution via MinGW DLL
- CVE-2026-11269HIGHChrome Extension Sandbox Escape (v149)
- CVE-2026-12057HIGHFoxit AI Sandbox Escape Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-42089HIGHYeoman Environment Arbitrary Package Installation Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-44358HIGHEspressif DangerJS Action Code Execution in Pull Request Workflows
- CVE-2026-44688HIGHEclipse Theia AI Chat Prompt Injection – Arbitrary Code Execution Risk
- CVE-2026-44691HIGHEclipse Theia Arbitrary Code Execution via Untrusted Task Execution