CVE-2026-20220: Cisco Crosswork Network Controller Template Engine Command Injection
Cisco Crosswork Network Controller's web management interface contains a flaw in how it validates input to its configuration template engine. An authenticated user with template write permissions can send specially crafted requests to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system, but only within directories where the template user account has write access. This is a post-authentication attack requiring valid credentials and specific permission levels.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-74
- Affected products
- 2 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-17 / 2026-06-22
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Crosswork Network Controller could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation in the configuration template engine of the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system in limited areas of the file system. This vulnerability affects only areas of the operating system for which the template user has write permissions. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid template user credentials with write permissions. Template users with read permissions cannot exploit this vulnerability.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-20220 stems from insufficient input validation in the configuration template engine component of Cisco Crosswork Network Controller's web-based management interface. The vulnerability is classified as improper neutralization of special elements used in a command (CWE-74), allowing command injection. An attacker with valid template user credentials possessing write permissions can craft requests that bypass input validation and execute arbitrary OS commands in restricted file system areas. Read-only template users cannot trigger this vulnerability. The attack vector is network-accessible via the web interface and requires low complexity, resulting in a CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 (Medium severity).
Business impact
Organizations relying on Cisco Crosswork Network Controller for network management face insider risk from compromised or malicious template administrators. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized command execution within templating directories, potentially enabling data exfiltration, system manipulation, or lateral movement if combined with other weaknesses. Impact is contained to file system areas where the template user has write permissions, limiting but not eliminating risk. This vulnerability primarily affects environments where template user accounts may be shared, delegated, or at elevated privilege levels.
Affected systems
This vulnerability affects Cisco Crosswork Network Controller. The vulnerability applies to instances where the web-based management interface is exposed to authenticated users and where template users with write permissions exist. Organizations should identify all instances of Crosswork Network Controller in their environment and audit which user accounts hold template write permissions.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires valid authentication as a template user with write permissions—a significant barrier that prevents opportunistic attacks. However, the attack complexity is low once credentials are obtained, meaning no special conditions or timing are needed. The network-accessible interface means any authenticated user with appropriate permissions can attempt exploitation from anywhere. The vulnerability does not appear in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, suggesting active exploitation in the wild has not been publicly confirmed, though this does not preclude undisclosed weaponization.
Remediation
Apply the security patch from Cisco that addresses input validation in the configuration template engine. Pending patch availability, implement access controls restricting template user account creation and write permissions to only personnel with genuine operational need. Review and revoke unnecessary write-level permissions from existing template users. Monitor template user activity and enforce principle of least privilege for administrative accounts accessing the management interface.
Patch guidance
Check the Cisco security advisory associated with CVE-2026-20220 for the specific patched software version applicable to your Crosswork Network Controller deployment. Verify the patch version against the vendor advisory before applying. Test patches in a non-production environment to ensure compatibility with your network management workflows. Prioritize patching systems where template users have elevated permissions or where multiple users share template accounts.
Detection guidance
Monitor access logs to the web-based management interface for template user authentication events, particularly from unusual source IPs or outside normal business hours. Implement alerting for configuration template engine requests containing suspicious syntax or special characters that may indicate injection attempts. Log all commands executed via template functionality and baseline normal activity. Consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) rule set to detect and block payloads targeting template input fields with known injection patterns.
Why prioritize this
While the CVSS score is Medium (6.3), the post-authentication requirement significantly reduces risk in environments with robust access controls. However, prioritization should account for the specifics of your environment: if template user permissions are broadly distributed or shared accounts are used, risk escalates. Organizations with externally-exposed Crosswork Network Controller instances or those managing critical infrastructure should patch promptly. The limited impact scope (restricted file system areas) and absence from KEV catalog suggest this is a measured-priority item for most enterprises, but high-priority for those with relaxed credential governance around template accounts.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 reflects low attack complexity, network accessibility, and the ability to achieve confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts within the file system scope accessible to the template user. The score is moderated by the requirement for valid authentication credentials with specific write permissions. Organizations should adjust their internal risk assessment upward if template user permissions are widespread, if the affected system manages sensitive network infrastructure, or if the system is internet-facing. Downward adjustment is appropriate for well-segmented environments where template user accounts are tightly controlled.
Frequently asked questions
Can a read-only template user exploit this vulnerability?
No. The vulnerability explicitly requires template user credentials with write permissions. Read-only template users cannot trigger this flaw, making permission segmentation an important mitigation.
Is this vulnerability currently being exploited in the wild?
There is no evidence of active exploitation at this time; CVE-2026-20220 does not appear in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. However, the absence from KEV does not guarantee zero real-world exploitation—it reflects publicly confirmed cases.
What if we restrict template users to read-only permissions?
Read-only template users cannot exploit this vulnerability. If your organization's workflows permit, converting write-access template accounts to read-only is an effective compensating control pending patch deployment.
How does the file system restriction limit the impact?
The attacker can only execute commands and modify files in directories where the template user account has write permissions. This typically limits damage to template-related configuration directories rather than system-wide compromise, though the exact scope depends on your permission configuration.
This analysis is based on the vendor-provided CVE description and CVSS scoring as of the publication date. Security characteristics and remediation steps may evolve as additional details emerge or vendor advisories are updated. Organizations should verify patch version numbers and compatibility against official Cisco security advisories before deployment. This explainer does not constitute professional security advice; consult your security team or a qualified cybersecurity firm for risk assessment tailored to your environment. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept details are provided herein. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-27. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10060MEDIUMTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Command Injection—End-of-Life Router Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10061MEDIUMTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Command Injection Vulnerability – Remediation via Replacement
- CVE-2026-10127MEDIUMEdimax BR-6478AC Command Injection in Firmware 1.23
- CVE-2026-10155MEDIUMSQL Injection in Bdtask Multi-Store Inventory Management System 1.0
- CVE-2026-10166MEDIUMEdimax BR-6478AC Command Injection – Authentication Required
- CVE-2026-10170MEDIUMSQL Injection in code-projects Visitor Management System 1.0
- CVE-2026-10171MEDIUMSQL Injection in code-projects Online Music Site 1.0 AdminUpdateAlbum.php
- CVE-2026-10175MEDIUMCode Injection in Aider-AI Aider 0.86.3 – Exploit Available