HIGH 7.5

CVE-2026-20217: ClamAV PESpin Parser Remote DoS Vulnerability

ClamAV's PESpin file format parser contains a memory safety flaw that allows remote attackers to crash the scanning engine by submitting a specially crafted file. When ClamAV processes the malicious file, improper boundary validation causes a buffer to be written beyond its allocated memory, terminating the scanner and disrupting security operations. The attacker needs only network access and no credentials; the vulnerable software will automatically process the file if scanned.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-120
Affected products
4 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-01 / 2026-07-09

NVD description (verbatim)

A vulnerability in the PESpin file format parser of ClamAV could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition, or possibly other expanded impacts, resulting from memory corruption on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper boundary checks for content in PESpin files during scanning, which may result in an out-of-bounds buffer write. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted file that contains PESpin content to be scanned by ClamAV on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the ClamAV scanning process to terminate, resulting in a DoS condition on the affected software.

1 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-20217 is a stack or heap buffer overflow in ClamAV's PESpin file parser triggered by missing bounds checks during content validation. The vulnerability maps to CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input) and occurs when the parser reads PESpin structures without verifying that write operations remain within buffer limits. An out-of-bounds write condition allows an attacker-controlled payload to overwrite adjacent memory. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects high network accessibility, low attack complexity, no privilege or user interaction requirements, and high availability impact; confidentiality and integrity impacts are not rated.

Business impact

Exploitation results in denial of service to ClamAV scanning operations, which can degrade malware detection capabilities across dependent security infrastructure. For organizations running Cisco Secure Endpoint (which bundles ClamAV) or standalone ClamAV deployments on mail gateways, file servers, or endpoint agents, a successful attack causes the scanner to crash, potentially allowing malicious files to pass undetected during the scanner's downtime. Repeated exploitation could create a pattern of service disruption, reducing confidence in the security scanning layer.

Affected systems

The vulnerability affects ClamAV and Cisco Secure Endpoint products that incorporate ClamAV's PESpin parser. Verify the exact affected versions and patched releases against the vendor's security advisory, as version numbers are not specified in the vulnerability record. Any deployment scanning untrusted files in PESpin format is at risk.

Exploitability

Exploitability is straightforward: an attacker crafts a PESpin-formatted file with malformed content that violates size boundaries, then submits it to a system running vulnerable ClamAV (e.g., via email, web upload, or network file share). The scanning process automatically triggers the parser without additional authentication or user interaction. No special privileges are required on the attacker's side. The attack is reliable if the malicious file reaches the scanner. CISA has not flagged this as KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerability), suggesting active exploitation in the wild has not yet been documented as of the publication date.

Remediation

Apply patches from Cisco and/or ClamAV project maintainers immediately upon availability. Identify all systems running ClamAV or Cisco Secure Endpoint in your environment—including mail appliances, file servers, and endpoint agents—and prioritize patch deployment. Until patches are applied, consider temporarily increasing file inspection sampling or disabling PESpin scanning if your environment does not require that format, though this reduces malware detection coverage.

Patch guidance

Consult the official Cisco Secure Endpoint and ClamAV security advisories for patched version numbers and availability timelines. Patches are typically released within weeks of publication for high-severity issues. Test patches in a non-production environment before broad rollout to ensure compatibility with existing scanning policies and integrations. Automated patch management tools should be configured to pull and deploy updates as soon as vendor guidance is finalized.

Detection guidance

Monitor ClamAV process logs and Cisco Secure Endpoint telemetry for scanner crashes or unexpected terminations correlated with file submission events. Alert on repeated scanner restarts within short time windows. Network-level detection is difficult because the payload is file content rather than network protocol anomalies; focus on behavioral signals (scanner hangs, segmentation faults) and file quarantine/alert patterns. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools can flag process crashes in the ClamAV parent process tree.

Why prioritize this

HIGH priority is warranted due to the HIGH CVSS score, remote exploitability with no authentication, and direct impact on a foundational security control (malware scanning). The absence of KEV status suggests the issue may not yet be actively exploited at scale, providing a window to patch before widespread attack campaigns begin. For mail and file servers, this vulnerability blocks a critical detection layer.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 reflects a remote network-accessible attack (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L), no privilege or user interaction (PR:N/UI:N), confined to the vulnerable component (S:U), and resulting in high availability impact (A:H). Confidentiality and integrity are rated 'None' because the out-of-bounds write causes termination rather than information disclosure or code execution. If proof exists that the memory corruption can be leveraged for code execution or information leakage, the score and severity could be re-evaluated upward; verify against updated vendor advisories.

Frequently asked questions

Can this vulnerability be exploited to gain code execution or steal data?

The current CVSS assessment does not credit code execution or information disclosure; the primary impact is denial of service via scanner termination. However, out-of-bounds writes can sometimes be chained to achieve code execution depending on memory layout and exploitation sophistication. Consult the vendor's detailed technical advisory for any mention of confirmed or theoretical code execution risk.

Do we need to block PESpin files in email and web gateways while waiting for patches?

If PESpin file scanning is not essential to your threat model, you may consider disabling it as a temporary mitigation. However, this reduces detection coverage. A safer interim approach is to monitor scanner health closely and implement alerts on scanner crashes, then prioritize patches for immediate deployment once available.

How does this affect Cisco Secure Endpoint compared to standalone ClamAV?

Cisco Secure Endpoint includes ClamAV as one of its scanning engines. The vulnerability may impact Secure Endpoint on Windows, Mac, or Linux endpoints, as well as Cisco's appliance-based products that use the same parser. Patch timelines and version numbers may differ between Secure Endpoint releases and upstream ClamAV; follow Cisco's advisory for Secure Endpoint-specific guidance.

Is there a workaround if patches are delayed?

Short-term mitigations include disabling PESpin format scanning (if not required), restricting file submissions to trusted sources, or isolating affected scanners behind additional access controls. However, these reduce malware detection coverage and are not substitutes for patching. Apply patches as soon as they become available.

This analysis is based on the CVE record as published and vendor advisories available as of the date shown. Patch version numbers, detailed technical mitigations, and timeline commitments must be verified against official Cisco and ClamAV project advisories before implementation. Exploitation details, proof-of-concept code, and attack telemetry are not included in this document. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessment based on their specific deployment and environment. SEC.co and its analysts make no warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness of forward-looking remediation guidance. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).