CVE-2026-14623: OMEC AMF NGAP DoS Vulnerability – Patch Guidance
A vulnerability in the OMEC Project AMF (Access and Mobility Management Function) component allows authenticated attackers to trigger a denial-of-service condition by manipulating NGAP (NG Application Protocol) messages, specifically those handled by the RRCInactiveTransitionReport function. An attacker with valid network credentials can send crafted messages that destabilize the AMF service, affecting call setup and user mobility. The issue affects versions up to 2.1.1, and exploit code has already been made public.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 4.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-404
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-04 / 2026-07-06
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability was determined in omec-project amf up to 2.1.1. This issue affects the function RRCInactiveTransitionReport of the component NGAP Message Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to denial of service. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 34bc6724acc97dba1f8691e586da95b042cb612d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
8 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-14623 is a denial-of-service vulnerability in the OMEC Project AMF's NGAP Message Handler component. The RRCInactiveTransitionReport function fails to properly validate or sanitize incoming NGAP messages, allowing an authenticated remote attacker to trigger resource exhaustion or improper state transitions. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-404 (Improper Resource Validation) and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (Medium severity). The attack vector is network-based with low complexity; authentication is required to execute the exploit. The impact is limited to availability (denial of service) with no confidentiality or integrity compromise.
Business impact
Telecommunications operators and enterprises deploying OMEC AMF infrastructure face potential service disruptions affecting mobile user authentication and session management. While the severity is rated Medium, the real-world impact depends on network architecture: if the AMF is a single point of failure without redundancy, even intermittent DoS attacks could degrade user experience and call completion rates. Organizations with proper load balancing and failover mechanisms will experience reduced risk. The public disclosure of exploit code increases the window of risk before patching is completed.
Affected systems
OMEC Project AMF versions up to and including 2.1.1 are affected. OMEC (Open Mobile Evolved Core) is an open-source 5G core network implementation; this vulnerability impacts deployments in private 5G networks, operator labs, and test environments, as well as any production systems built on these components. Verify your specific OMEC deployment version against the vendor advisory to confirm exposure.
Exploitability
This vulnerability requires network-level access and valid authentication credentials—an attacker must have legitimate user or service account access to the network where the AMF operates. The attack itself is straightforward: sending a specially-crafted NGAP message to the RRCInactiveTransitionReport handler does not require user interaction or system-level privileges. The publicly disclosed exploit code lowers the barrier to weaponization, though the authentication requirement prevents opportunistic, large-scale external attacks. Insider threats or compromised service accounts pose the most credible immediate risk.
Remediation
Apply the patch identified as commit 34bc6724acc97dba1f8691e586da95b042cb612d to upgrade your OMEC AMF deployment. Review the patch changelog to confirm it addresses the RRCInactiveTransitionReport validation issue. For organizations unable to patch immediately, implement network segmentation and access controls to restrict NGAP message sources to trusted elements; monitor AMF logs for repeated NGAP message patterns that may indicate exploitation attempts.
Patch guidance
Retrieve the patch commit 34bc6724acc97dba1f8691e586da95b042cb612d from the OMEC Project repository and test it in a non-production environment before deployment. Verify the patch version meets your operational requirements and does not introduce compatibility issues with dependent components (e.g., RAN elements, UPF). Plan a maintenance window for patching; coordinate with network teams to ensure graceful failover if your deployment has redundancy. Post-patch, validate that NGAP message handling resumes normal behavior under load.
Detection guidance
Monitor NGAP message processing logs for anomalous RRCInactiveTransitionReport messages, including those with malformed payloads or unexpected state transitions. Set alerts on AMF resource utilization spikes (CPU, memory) that correlate with NGAP message ingestion. Network-based detection can focus on NGAP traffic patterns from authenticated users; unusual burst rates or repetitive message sequences from a single source warrant investigation. Enable detailed NGAP protocol logging if your platform supports it.
Why prioritize this
While the CVSS score is Medium (4.3), prioritize this for near-term remediation due to the publicly disclosed exploit and low attack complexity. Authentication requirement limits the threat actor pool but does not eliminate insider risk. The impact on availability in a production 5G network, especially if AMF redundancy is absent, could justify accelerated patching. Organizations in the OMEC ecosystem should treat this as higher priority than the base CVSS suggests.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 reflects a network-accessible, low-complexity attack that requires user-level authentication and causes only availability impact. This places it in the Medium severity band. However, the score does not fully capture deployment-specific factors: a single-point-of-failure AMF in production carries higher business risk than an AMF in a lab environment. The public exploit disclosure increases practical exploitability; threat actors can repurpose published code without significant reverse engineering effort.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to patch immediately if our OMEC deployment is behind a firewall and only accessible to trusted internal users?
Authentication is required, so the attack surface is limited to users with network credentials. However, the insider threat risk and potential for lateral movement from compromised accounts still warrant timely patching. A maintenance window within the next 30 days is reasonable if external threat levels are low, but do not indefinitely defer—the public exploit will eventually find its way into automated attack tools.
What should we do if we cannot immediately patch due to operational constraints?
Implement preventive controls: restrict NGAP message sources at the firewall to known, trusted RAN elements; enforce strong authentication and access logging; monitor AMF performance closely for signs of DoS activity. Consider deploying a secondary AMF instance for failover. Schedule a firm patch date with your operations team and communicate the deadline to stakeholders.
Does this vulnerability affect the data plane (user traffic) or only the control plane?
This vulnerability is in the NGAP Message Handler, which is a control plane component. It does not directly compromise the confidentiality or integrity of user data in transit (the data plane). However, a successful DoS attack can disrupt session establishment and mobility, indirectly impairing user experience and service availability.
How can we verify that our patch was successful?
After applying the patch, re-validate that the OMEC version matches the post-patch release number, review the commit history to confirm the specific fix is included, and run functional tests against your RAN simulators or live network to ensure NGAP message handling (including RRCInactiveTransitionReport) completes without errors or state anomalies.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes. SEC.co does not conduct independent verification of vendor claims or patch efficacy. Always consult the official OMEC Project advisory and release notes before applying patches. The CVSS score and severity ratings are based on the published vector and do not account for your specific network topology, redundancy posture, or threat model. Security teams should adjust their prioritization based on organizational risk tolerance and operational context. No exploit code or detailed attack methodology is provided or endorsed by this analysis. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-13. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10113MEDIUMOpen5GS NF-Profile Parser Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10115MEDIUMOpen5GS NF Profile Parser DoS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10116MEDIUMOpen5GS UE Authentication Denial-of-Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10117MEDIUMOpen5GS nghttp2-server Denial of Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10156MEDIUMOpen5GS Resource Exhaustion Vulnerability in nf-instances Endpoint
- CVE-2026-10190MEDIUMTenda W12 Web Interface Denial-of-Service Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10224MEDIUMNousResearch hermes-agent Webhook Resource Exhaustion Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10650MEDIUMLibwebsockets SSH Handler Resource Exhaustion Vulnerability