CVE-2026-14474: SSSD LDAP Sudo Provider Privilege Escalation - Remediation Guide
SSSD (System Security Services Daemon) contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in its LDAP sudo provider. When administrators don't explicitly configure where SSSD should search for sudo rules in LDAP (the ldap_sudo_search_base option), the daemon searches the entire directory tree by default. An attacker with write permissions to any part of the LDAP directory can exploit this by injecting a malicious sudo rule that grants root-level privileges across all machines using SSSD for authentication. This transforms a limited directory write capability into full system compromise on enrolled hosts.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-1188
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-07 / 2026-08-04
NVD description (verbatim)
A flaw was found in SSSD's LDAP sudo provider. When the ldap_sudo_search_base option is not explicitly configured, SSSD searches the entire LDAP directory tree for sudoRole objects. An authenticated attacker with write access to any subtree can inject a sudoRole object granting root-level sudo privileges on all SSSD-enrolled hosts.
13 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-14474 stems from insufficient input scoping in SSSD's LDAP sudo provider implementation. The vulnerability occurs when ldap_sudo_search_base is undefined, causing SSSD to perform an unrestricted LDAP search for sudoRole objects across the entire directory tree rather than a confined subtree. An authenticated attacker with LDAP write access to any organizational unit or subtree can craft a sudoRole object that matches SSSD's search criteria. Upon sudo invocation on an SSSD-enrolled host, the injected rule is evaluated and, if properly formatted, grants sudo privileges without password. The attack surface is significant because many deployments inherit default SSSD configurations or use permissive LDAP ACLs that allow write access to non-administrative accounts.
Business impact
Organizations relying on SSSD for centralized Linux/Unix authentication face a critical privilege escalation risk. An insider with modest LDAP write permissions—such as a developer managing application accounts, a contractor with directory access, or a compromised service account—can escalate to root on every SSSD-enrolled system simultaneously. This enables lateral movement, data exfiltration, malware deployment, and persistent backdoor installation. The blast radius scales with the number of enrolled hosts and the breadth of LDAP write permissions in the environment. Incident response becomes exponentially harder when attackers gain root across infrastructure en masse.
Affected systems
Any Linux or Unix system running SSSD with the LDAP provider is potentially affected if ldap_sudo_search_base is not explicitly configured in sssd.conf. This includes RHEL, CentOS, Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, and other distributions that package SSSD. The vulnerability specifically impacts deployments that: (1) use SSSD for sudo rule evaluation via LDAP, (2) have not explicitly set ldap_sudo_search_base to a restricted search base, and (3) exist in environments where non-administrative accounts hold LDAP write permissions. Verify your SSSD configuration and LDAP directory permissions to determine exposure.
Exploitability
The vulnerability requires authentication (the attacker must hold valid LDAP credentials) but is otherwise straightforward to exploit. No special tools or reverse-engineering are needed; standard LDAP clients suffice to inject a sudoRole object. The attack is reliable and deterministic—once injected, the malicious sudo rule persists until manually removed. The primary barrier to exploitation is organizational access to LDAP write permissions; however, many enterprises grant such permissions liberally to application teams, contractors, or cloud infrastructure accounts. The attack leaves minimal forensic evidence at the system level unless sudoLog is enabled in LDAP.
Remediation
Immediately configure ldap_sudo_search_base explicitly in sssd.conf on all SSSD-enrolled hosts to restrict sudo rule searches to a specific, controlled subtree (e.g., ou=sudoRules,dc=example,dc=com). This prevents SSSD from searching the entire directory tree and closes the injection vector. Concurrently, audit LDAP access controls to remove unnecessary write permissions from non-administrative accounts and service principals. Apply security updates from your Linux distribution vendor as they become available. Additionally, enable sudo logging and LDAP audit logs to detect any injected sudoRole objects and retroactive privilege escalations.
Patch guidance
Consult your Linux distribution vendor (Red Hat, Canonical, etc.) for official SSSD security updates addressing CVE-2026-14474. Patches will likely include changes to SSSD's LDAP sudo provider to enforce a default or required search base scope. Apply updates according to your change management process, prioritizing production authentication infrastructure. Before applying patches, verify ldap_sudo_search_base is already configured in your sssd.conf to ensure continuity of sudo operations. Test in a non-production environment first, as misconfigured search bases can break sudo functionality.
Detection guidance
Review sssd.conf on all deployed systems to identify instances where ldap_sudo_search_base is absent or commented out. Use configuration management tools (Ansible, Puppet, Chef) to audit compliance at scale. Monitor LDAP logs for unexpected sudoRole object creation, particularly in organizational units not typically used for sudo rules. Enable sudo logging on critical systems and correlate with LDAP audit trails. Query your LDAP directory for sudoRole objects in unusual locations outside your designated sudo search base; these are likely injected rules. Implement LDAP access controls (ACLs) to restrict write permissions and audit changes to sudoRole entries.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention due to its CVSS 8.8 HIGH severity, the low barriers to exploitation for authenticated insiders, and the potential for rapid, enterprise-wide privilege escalation. The attack enables root-level compromise across numerous systems from a single injection point, amplifying the impact of any account compromise or insider threat. Organizations should treat this as a critical authentication infrastructure risk and remediate configuration and access control gaps before distributing patches.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects: (1) network-adjacent attack surface (LDAP is often internal but accessible to multiple user classes), (2) low attack complexity (standard LDAP write operations), (3) requirement for prior authentication (not unauthenticated), (4) high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (root-level compromise on affected hosts). The score does not account for organizational context such as LDAP write permission distribution, the number of enrolled systems, or the criticality of affected infrastructure; adjust your internal risk rating accordingly.
Frequently asked questions
If I don't use SSSD for sudo rule evaluation, am I affected?
No. This vulnerability is specific to SSSD's LDAP sudo provider. If your organization uses local sudoers files, SSSD with local sudo, or a different centralized sudo mechanism (e.g., Centrify, Quest), you are not impacted by this flaw. Verify your sudo configuration to confirm SSSD and LDAP are in use for rule evaluation.
What if my LDAP directory is not writable by general users?
Your risk is significantly lower. The attack requires LDAP write access, which many organizations restrict to directory administrators. However, review your LDAP ACLs carefully—service accounts, application teams, and contractors may hold unintended write permissions. Privilege escalation attacks often combine this vulnerability with account compromise, so audit both LDAP access and account security.
Does explicitly setting ldap_sudo_search_base fully mitigate the vulnerability?
Setting ldap_sudo_search_base to a restricted subtree is the primary mitigation and eliminates the unrestricted tree search. However, apply vendor security updates when available, as they may contain additional hardening or related fixes. The configuration change alone is not a long-term substitute for patching.
What should ldap_sudo_search_base be set to?
Set it to the organizational unit (OU) or base DN where your sudoRole objects are legitimately stored. A typical example is ldap_sudo_search_base = ou=sudoRules,dc=example,dc=com. Coordinate with your directory administrators to identify the correct OU and ensure all sudoRole entries are contained within it. Misconfiguration can break sudo functionality, so test thoroughly before production deployment.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and reflects the vulnerability details available as of the last update. Consult official vendor advisories and your internal security team before making deployment or patching decisions. SEC.co makes no warranties regarding the completeness or accuracy of this analysis and assumes no liability for actions taken in reliance upon it. Always verify patch availability and test in non-production environments before deploying security updates to production systems. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-16. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-35672HIGHphpMyFAQ Authentication Bypass Allows Unauthorized FAQ Content Injection
- CVE-2026-40994HIGHSpring Web Services WS-Security BSP Bypass
- CVE-2026-44825HIGHApache Solr Hardcoded Credentials Remote Admin Access
- CVE-2026-44892HIGHNetty HTTP/3 Header Memory Exhaustion DoS Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-46517HIGHLMDeploy Supply-Chain RCE via Hardcoded Trust Settings
- CVE-2026-48502HIGHMessagePack for C# Stack Overflow in Timestamp Parsing
- CVE-2026-54066HIGHSiYuan Path Traversal – Unauthenticated File Read in Publish Mode
- CVE-2026-56285HIGHNitter Media Proxy SSRF and Hardcoded HMAC Key Vulnerability