MEDIUM 5.3

CVE-2026-14414: Skia Input Validation Flaw in Google Chrome – Memory Disclosure Risk

A flaw in Skia, the graphics library used by Google Chrome, allows an attacker who has already compromised Chrome's renderer process to read sensitive information from memory by tricking a user into visiting a malicious webpage. The vulnerability requires the attacker to control the renderer—a significant prerequisite—but once achieved, could leak data like passwords, tokens, or other secrets stored in memory.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 5.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-20
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-01 / 2026-07-02

NVD description (verbatim)

Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-14414 is an insufficient input validation vulnerability in Skia (CWE-20) affecting Google Chrome versions before 150.0.7871.46. The flaw permits a threat actor with renderer process compromise to craft malicious HTML that bypasses validation checks and reads arbitrary process memory. The attack surface is limited to users who visit attacker-controlled or compromised websites after the renderer is already under adversary control, making this a post-compromise lateral-movement or information-theft vector rather than a direct entry point.

Business impact

The primary risk is data exfiltration from Chrome processes that may contain authentication credentials, session tokens, personal information from browsing history, form data, or cached sensitive material. Organizations where users frequently handle confidential information in browser contexts—financial services, healthcare, legal sectors—face elevated risk of secondary breaches if an attacker leverages this to steal credentials or tokens. The requirement for prior renderer compromise limits the immediate exposure surface but increases the value of this flaw in multi-stage attack chains.

Affected systems

Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.46 are affected. The vulnerability applies across all platforms where Chrome runs (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS) since Skia is a core cross-platform component. End users and organizations with managed Chrome deployments, particularly those unable to rapidly auto-update, remain vulnerable until they upgrade to the patched version.

Exploitability

Exploitability is constrained by the requirement that an attacker must first compromise the renderer process—a non-trivial hurdle that typically requires either a separate browser-based vulnerability, drive-by download, or supply-chain compromise. Once that precondition is met, the attack itself is feasible via a crafted HTML page, though the CVSS score reflects the attack complexity and prerequisite as moderate barriers (AC:H, PR:N). The vulnerability is not listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, suggesting active in-the-wild exploitation has not been publicly documented at time of publication.

Remediation

Users and administrators should update Google Chrome to version 150.0.7871.46 or later. Chrome's auto-update mechanism will deliver the patch automatically for most users within hours; however, administrators managing locked-down deployments should verify patch deployment across their estate. There is no workaround; patching is the only mitigation.

Patch guidance

Deploy Chrome 150.0.7871.46 or newer. For managed Chrome deployments, use your organization's patch management or mobile device management (MDM) system to enforce the update. Verify successful patching by checking chrome://version in the address bar. Because Chrome auto-updates, most users will receive the patch passively, but verify critical systems and devices with disabled auto-update have been updated within 7 days of release.

Detection guidance

Detection of exploitation is challenging because the flaw operates within renderer memory and requires prior process compromise. Focus monitoring on unusual renderer behavior or memory-access patterns if you have visibility into Chrome process activity via endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools. Monitor for suspicious processes spawning Chrome or attempting to inject code into Chrome. Since the flaw is post-compromise leverage, prioritize detection of the initial renderer compromise vector—malware, malicious scripts, or compromised websites—rather than the vulnerability itself.

Why prioritize this

Prioritize patching based on user population and data sensitivity. While the CVSS score (5.3, Medium) is moderate, the context matters: if your organization's users regularly handle credentials or secrets in the browser, or if you've detected renderer-process compromise attempts, this patch should move up the queue. The requirement for prior compromise limits it from critical status but does not eliminate the risk, particularly in organizations dealing with sensitive data or under active adversary targeting.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 (Medium) reflects: (1) network-based attack vector (AV:N) because malicious HTML is delivered over the network; (2) high attack complexity (AC:H) because the attacker must first compromise the renderer, a non-trivial prerequisite; (3) no privilege escalation required (PR:N); (4) user interaction required (UI:R)—the user must visit the attacker's page; and (5) confidentiality impact (C:H) as the flaw leaks sensitive memory, but no integrity or availability impact. The score appropriately reflects a data-leakage risk that is significant in context but operationally difficult to exploit in the wild.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need to be worried about this if my organization blocks malicious websites?

Website blocking provides some defense against direct exploitation, but it is not a complete solution. An attacker could compromise a trusted site, use phishing, or exploit a user's browsing behavior. Additionally, the initial renderer compromise might come from a separate vulnerability or social engineering. Patching remains essential.

What is 'renderer process compromise' and how would an attacker achieve it?

Chrome's renderer process is the sandbox responsible for running web content. An attacker typically compromises it via an unpatched browser vulnerability (a separate CVE), a malicious plugin, or by convincing a user to run malicious code. Once the renderer is compromised, this CVE allows the attacker to read sensitive memory that might not otherwise be accessible.

Is this vulnerability currently being exploited in the wild?

There is no evidence of widespread exploitation. The vulnerability is not listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. However, the absence of public reporting does not guarantee the vulnerability is not used by sophisticated threat actors in targeted campaigns. Patch promptly to reduce risk.

Can I protect myself without updating Chrome?

There is no effective workaround. The vulnerability exists in Skia's core rendering logic, so disabling extensions, clearing cache, or restricting JavaScript will not prevent exploitation if the renderer is already compromised. Patching to version 150.0.7871.46 or later is the only mitigation.

This advisory is provided for informational purposes to assist security professionals in risk assessment and remediation planning. SEC.co does not guarantee the accuracy of vendor statements, patch availability, or timing of updates. Always verify patch versions against official vendor advisories before deployment. Exploitation details are omitted intentionally to prevent weaponization. Organizations should assess their specific threat landscape and data sensitivity when prioritizing this patch. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).