MEDIUM 6.5

CVE-2026-14324: RAOP Module Denial of Service via Unbounded Content-Length

A flaw in the RAOP (Remote Audio Output Protocol) module allows an attacker on the local network to cause a denial of service by sending requests with extremely large Content-Length values. The module fails to properly validate these values and does not check whether internal memory allocation operations succeed, leading to potential crashes or service unavailability.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-476
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-07-01 / 2026-07-01

NVD description (verbatim)

RAOP module accepts unbounded Content-Length values and does not check the pw_array_add() return.

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-14324 is a null pointer dereference vulnerability (CWE-476) in the RAOP module. The vulnerability stems from two weaknesses: (1) the module accepts unbounded Content-Length header values without validation, and (2) it fails to check the return value of pw_array_add() calls, which can indicate memory allocation failures. An attacker with network adjacency can exploit this by crafting malicious requests, triggering allocation failures that are not handled, resulting in a denial of service condition. The attack requires no authentication or user interaction.

Business impact

This vulnerability enables denial-of-service attacks against services using the vulnerable RAOP module. While confidentiality and integrity are not compromised, availability can be significantly impacted. Organizations relying on RAOP-based audio streaming or remote audio services may experience service interruptions. The local network requirement limits the attack surface to adjacent networks, but this remains a concern in multi-tenant environments, guest networks, or scenarios where lateral movement has already occurred.

Affected systems

The RAOP module is affected. However, the provided data does not specify which vendor products or versions contain this module. Organizations should check vendor advisories and product documentation to determine if their deployments are affected. Common products implementing RAOP include certain multimedia servers, audio streaming applications, and AirPlay-compatible devices.

Exploitability

Exploitation is straightforward from a technical perspective: an attacker on the adjacent network (same subnet or reachable network segment) can send a specially crafted HTTP request with an unbounded Content-Length header. No authentication is required, and the attack succeeds automatically without requiring user interaction. The primary barrier to exploitation is network adjacency; public internet attacks are not feasible unless the vulnerable service is intentionally exposed or accessed through compromised network infrastructure.

Remediation

Remediation requires patching the RAOP module to: (1) validate and enforce reasonable limits on Content-Length headers, and (2) implement proper error checking for pw_array_add() and similar allocation functions, gracefully handling failures rather than proceeding with null pointers. Apply patches from your vendor as soon as they become available. Until patches are deployed, network segmentation and access controls limiting RAOP service exposure to trusted networks can reduce risk.

Patch guidance

Monitor your vendor's security advisories for patches addressing CVE-2026-14324. Apply patches to all affected RAOP deployments according to your change management procedures. Test patches in non-production environments first to ensure compatibility with your audio streaming infrastructure. Prioritize patching systems exposed to untrusted network segments.

Detection guidance

Monitor network traffic to RAOP services for requests with unusually large Content-Length values or malformed headers. Application-level logging should capture failed memory allocations or unexpected service terminations. Intrusion detection systems can be tuned to flag HTTP requests with Content-Length headers exceeding reasonable thresholds for typical audio streaming use cases. Host-based monitoring should alert on unexpected restarts or crashes of RAOP service processes.

Why prioritize this

While the CVSS score is MEDIUM (6.5), this vulnerability warrants prompt attention because: (1) exploitation is trivial once network access is gained, (2) no special skills or tools are required, (3) availability impacts can be severe for audio-dependent services, and (4) it affects a protocol component often deployed in networked multimedia environments. The lack of KEV listing does not diminish the need to patch; it may reflect low current exploitation in the wild rather than low risk.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 (MEDIUM) reflects: network attack vector limited to adjacent access (AV:A), low attack complexity (AC:L), no privilege requirement (PR:N), no user interaction needed (UI:N), unchanged scope (S:U), no confidentiality or integrity impact (C:N/I:N), but high availability impact (A:H). The adjacent-network requirement prevents a higher score despite the ease of exploitation and severity of impact.

Frequently asked questions

What is RAOP and why does it matter?

RAOP (Remote Audio Output Protocol) is used for streaming audio over IP networks, commonly in AirPlay implementations and compatible audio devices. It enables remote control and playback of audio across network devices. A compromise of RAOP availability directly affects multimedia services and user experience.

Do I need to be on the internet for this to affect me?

No. The attack requires adjacency to the target network (same subnet or routable network segment), not internet exposure. However, this includes internal networks, guest networks, and any attacker who has gained a foothold on your network infrastructure.

Is my data at risk if this vulnerability is exploited?

Data confidentiality and integrity are not compromised by this vulnerability; the impact is limited to availability (denial of service). However, service disruption itself can have cascading business impacts depending on how RAOP services are used in your environment.

How urgent is patching?

Patching should be prioritized for RAOP services exposed to untrusted network segments. If your RAOP deployment is isolated to a secure, controlled network with strong access controls, the timeline can be less urgent but should not be deferred indefinitely. Always apply patches as part of your normal maintenance cycle.

This analysis is based on the published CVE record as of the date provided. The affected vendor products list was empty in the source data; verify the specific products and versions impacted using official vendor security advisories before deploying patches. This vulnerability is not currently listed on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Patch versions and remediation steps must be confirmed directly with your vendor. SEC.co makes no warranties regarding the completeness or real-time accuracy of this intelligence and recommends consulting with your vendor and conducting internal vulnerability assessments to determine your organization's specific risk profile. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-10. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).