CVE-2026-14142: Google Chrome Extension UI Spoofing Vulnerability
A flaw in how Google Chrome handles extensions could allow an attacker who has already compromised your browser's rendering engine to trick you into clicking malicious UI elements by disguising them as legitimate browser controls. The attacker would need to first gain control of the renderer process—typically through a separate vulnerability or compromise—then exploit this weakness to display fake dialogs or buttons that appear to come from Chrome itself. This is a secondary attack that depends on prior compromise.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.4 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-1021, CWE-451
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-30 / 2026-07-01
NVD description (verbatim)
Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
2 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-14142 is an inappropriate implementation vulnerability in the Chrome Extensions system affecting versions prior to 150.0.7871.47. The flaw resides in how the renderer process validates UI elements when rendering crafted HTML pages, creating conditions for UI spoofing attacks. An attacker with renderer process access can construct HTML that mimics native Chrome UI components, bypassing intended separation between extension UI and browser UI. The weakness stems from insufficient validation of UI context in the extension display layer, classified under CWE-1021 (Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames) and CWE-451 (User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information).
Business impact
The practical risk depends heavily on your threat model. If your organization primarily concerns itself with external attackers on the open internet, this vulnerability carries limited immediate risk because it requires pre-existing renderer compromise. However, if you operate in environments where sophisticated adversaries may chain vulnerabilities, or where insider threats are relevant, the ability to spoof browser UI could facilitate credential harvesting, unauthorized extension installations, or malicious API authorization dialogs. The impact is primarily integrity and confidentiality—attackers cannot crash the browser or escalate privileges directly through this flaw.
Affected systems
Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 are vulnerable. This includes all older release channels (Stable, Beta, Dev) below that version threshold. Chromium-based browsers that incorporate the vulnerable extension handling code may also be affected, though the advisory specifically names Chrome. Organizations should verify their deployed Chrome versions against this threshold; enterprise deployments often lag behind the latest release, making this relevant even after public disclosure.
Exploitability
Exploitability is constrained by a prerequisite: the attacker must first compromise the renderer process through an independent attack vector. This significantly lowers the practical attack surface. Once renderer access is achieved, however, crafting malicious HTML to spoof UI is relatively straightforward for an attacker with modest technical capability. No user interaction beyond the initial click on a malicious page is required. The CVSS score of 5.4 (MEDIUM) reflects this two-stage requirement and limited scope of impact.
Remediation
Update Google Chrome to version 150.0.7871.47 or later. Google has patched the inappropriate extension UI validation logic in this release. For enterprise environments, use configuration management tools to enforce automatic updates or deploy the patched version through your standard software distribution pipeline. Verify the update is applied across all user devices, as Chrome's auto-update mechanism may not reach all endpoints uniformly in large organizations.
Patch guidance
Apply Chrome version 150.0.7871.47 or any subsequent release. Patch deployment should prioritize systems where sensitive extensions are in use or where renderer compromise risk is elevated (e.g., systems that frequently visit untrusted websites or handle email attachments). Organizations running older Chrome versions should test the patched version in a representative environment first to confirm no compatibility issues with critical extensions or internal policies before rolling out organization-wide. Verify patch application by checking the About Chrome menu for confirmation of the installed version.
Detection guidance
Detection is challenging because successful exploitation may not produce obvious browser artifacts. Monitor for: (1) unexpected extension installations or permissions changes; (2) unusual extension behavior preceding user authorization dialogs; (3) patterns of UI-related security warnings followed by credential entry or payment transactions; (4) browser crashes or renderer process restarts correlated with extension activity. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) platforms should flag suspicious renderer process behavior, particularly injection or code execution attempts. Log extension permission grants and correlate them with user reports of suspicious UI elements.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits attention but is not critical. Prioritize it below remote code execution or authentication bypass flaws affecting the same product. However, rank it above low-severity issues if your organization has a history of multi-stage attacks or if renderer vulnerabilities are known to be actively chained by your threat actors. The two-stage requirement and limited impact scope (integrity/confidentiality only) justify a measured approach: patch on your next scheduled Chrome update cycle rather than emergency deployment, but do not defer indefinitely.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS score of 5.4 reflects a moderate risk posture. The attack vector is network-based and requires no privileges, but the prerequisite (compromised renderer process) adds practical friction. User interaction is required (clicking the malicious page). The scope is unchanged, and the impact is limited to partial disclosure and modification of information—no availability impact. The score appropriately penalizes the requirement for prior compromise while recognizing that once an attacker reaches the renderer, the spoofing capability is straightforward to exploit.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to patch immediately if I'm running Chrome 149?
Not necessarily as an emergency. This vulnerability requires the attacker to first compromise your renderer process, which typically demands a separate exploit or social engineering campaign. Patch it during your next planned Chrome update cycle within the next 1–2 weeks. If your organization frequently visits untrusted sites or handles high-risk email, move it to the next update cycle sooner.
Does this affect Chrome on mobile devices?
The advisory does not specify mobile Chrome explicitly. Because mobile Chrome shares much of the rendering engine codebase with desktop Chrome, it is likely affected. Check your mobile device Chrome version (Settings > About Chrome) and ensure it meets or exceeds 150.0.7871.47 once that version is available for your platform.
Can this vulnerability allow an attacker to steal my passwords?
Not directly. However, the UI spoofing capability could be weaponized to trick you into entering credentials or granting extension permissions if an attacker has already compromised the renderer through another vulnerability. The flaw itself does not bypass password managers or encryption—it's a social engineering vector rather than a technical exploit of authentication systems.
What's the difference between this flaw and a typical malicious website?
A malicious website can display fake login forms or warnings to you. This vulnerability allows an attacker who has compromised your browser's internals to display fake UI that *looks like it came from Chrome itself*—not just a website. That higher level of trust makes users more likely to comply with its instructions, but it still requires prior compromise of the renderer process.
This analysis is based on the publicly available CVE description and CVSS vector as of the published date. Verify all patch versions and affected product editions against the official Google Chrome release notes and security advisories before deploying patches. No exploit code or proof-of-concept is provided. This vulnerability requires pre-existing renderer compromise to be exploitable in practice; organizations should assess their specific threat model when prioritizing remediation. SEC.co does not guarantee the completeness or real-time accuracy of threat intelligence and recommends cross-referencing multiple sources for critical decisions. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-09. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-14110MEDIUMChrome Dark Mode UI Spoofing Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0061MEDIUMAndroid WindowState Tapjacking Vulnerability – Permission Escalation Risk
- CVE-2026-10984MEDIUMGoogle Chrome Android UI Spoofing Vulnerability – Medium Severity
- CVE-2026-11001MEDIUMGoogle Chrome UI Spoofing in Payments – Patch Now
- CVE-2026-11019MEDIUMChrome Android Payments Domain Spoofing Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11107MEDIUMGoogle Chrome UI Spoofing Vulnerability – Patch Guide
- CVE-2026-11215MEDIUMChrome Android Domain Spoofing Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-11216MEDIUMChrome File Input UI Spoofing – Patch to 149.0.7827.53