MEDIUM 6.5

CVE-2026-13876: Chrome Content Security Policy Bypass via Network Interception

Google Chrome versions before 150.0.7871.47 contain a flaw in how the browser handles network traffic that allows an attacker positioned to intercept network communications to bypass the browser's Content Security Policy (CSP) protections. An attacker exploiting this would need to be in a position to monitor or modify traffic between a user and the websites they visit, such as on a shared or compromised network. The attacker cannot directly steal data or crash the browser, but can bypass CSP rules that normally prevent malicious scripts from running, potentially enabling further attacks if the attacker can inject their own content.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.5 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-693
Affected products
1 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-30 / 2026-07-02

NVD description (verbatim)

Inappropriate implementation in Network in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed an attacker in a privileged network position to bypass content security policy via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

This vulnerability stems from an inappropriate implementation in Chrome's Network layer that fails to properly enforce Content Security Policy directives when processing malicious network traffic. The flaw is classified under CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure), indicating a breakdown in a security control rather than a direct injection or parsing flaw. An attacker with a privileged network position—such as control over a local network segment, ISP-level access, or a compromised proxy—can craft network traffic that causes the browser to disregard CSP headers or policies the website intended to enforce. The browser requires user interaction to trigger the vulnerability, suggesting the attacker must induce the user to navigate to a target site or click a malicious link within the context of the compromised network. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 reflects the combination of network-level attack surface, no authentication required, low complexity, user interaction requirement, and integrity impact (ability to inject content) without confidentiality or availability impact.

Business impact

For enterprise environments, this vulnerability represents a network-layer risk rather than a browser-only issue. Organizations with adequate network monitoring and segmentation may face lower exposure. However, for users on untrusted or shared networks (coffee shops, hotels, public Wi-Fi), the ability to bypass CSP creates a window for injection attacks that could lead to credential theft, malware delivery, or session hijacking if combined with other web attack techniques. For Chrome-dependent workflows, organizations should prioritize patch deployment to reduce the window of exposure, particularly for users who frequently work on open networks. The impact is contained to integrity—no direct data exfiltration or system compromise—but can facilitate secondary attacks.

Affected systems

Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 are affected. This includes stable, extended, and legacy release channels running earlier versions. The vulnerability does not affect Chromium-based browsers unless they have backported the same vulnerable code path. Users should verify their current Chrome version (Settings > About Chrome) and ensure automatic updates are enabled. Organizations using managed Chrome instances should verify patch deployment to 150.0.7871.47 or later.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires a privileged network position, meaning the attacker must be able to observe, modify, or redirect network traffic. This could be achieved through ARP spoofing on a local network, BGP hijacking at ISP scale, compromised proxy servers, or man-in-the-middle positioning on a shared Wi-Fi network. Importantly, the attacker cannot exploit this through a simple malicious website; they must actively interfere with network communications. User interaction is required, indicating the victim must visit a website while the attacker maintains the network position and is actively injecting traffic. The barrier to exploitation is moderate—it is not a one-click remote code execution, but organized attackers or state actors with network infrastructure access could carry out such attacks at scale. Casual attackers would find this difficult. The vulnerability is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, suggesting active exploitation has not been reported at the time of publication.

Remediation

Update Google Chrome to version 150.0.7871.47 or later. Chrome users with automatic updates enabled will receive this patch automatically; verify completion by navigating to Settings > About Chrome. For enterprise environments, deploy the patch through your configuration management system and verify rollout using Chrome enterprise policies or mobile device management (MDM) tools. No workarounds exist; patching is the only effective mitigation. Organizations concerned about network-level attacks should complement the patch with network segmentation, VPN enforcement for users on untrusted networks, and HSTS preloading for critical sites to reduce the attack surface.

Patch guidance

The patch is available in Chrome 150.0.7871.47. Verify the version in Settings > About Chrome; the browser will check for updates automatically and install them on next restart. For enterprise deployments: confirm your Chrome release channel and push the update through your MDM or Group Policy distribution mechanism. Test on a subset of devices before full rollout if your environment requires validation. Note that older Chrome versions (those on the extended support channel) should also be updated; check Google's official security advisory for guidance specific to extended support timelines. The patch does not require any configuration changes—it is a drop-in replacement.

Detection guidance

End-point detection is limited because the vulnerability requires active network interception; you cannot detect exploitation by observing Chrome process behavior alone. However, organizations can improve network visibility by: (1) Monitoring for ARP spoofing, DHCP snooping violations, or unexpected proxy injection on managed networks; (2) Using certificate pinning or HPKP headers on sensitive internal sites to detect man-in-the-middle attempts; (3) Analyzing DNS and TLS logs for unexplained redirects or certificate mismatches; (4) Deploying network intrusion detection systems (IDS) that flag suspicious traffic patterns. At the browser level, you can audit CSP policy compliance by reviewing Security tab warnings in Chrome DevTools. For forensics: if you suspect exploitation, review network packet captures for injected content and correlate with browser history and page source artifacts.

Why prioritize this

This vulnerability merits prompt patching due to its potential to enable secondary attacks despite the requirement for network-level access. Organizations should prioritize it as a medium-priority patch, staging deployment within 1-2 weeks. The patch is low-risk (it is a security fix with no known breaking changes), making it safe to deploy broadly. Highest priority should go to users who work on untrusted networks (remote workers, mobile staff, contractors), followed by general office-based users. The vulnerability's absence from the KEV catalog suggests it has not been exploited at scale in the wild, providing a window of opportunity to patch proactively before it becomes a target.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 (MEDIUM) reflects a network-accessible vulnerability that requires attacker positioning, no authentication, low attack complexity, user interaction, and integrity impact only. The network requirement (AV:N) and lack of privileges or authentication (PR:N, AU:N) elevate the score, but the requirement for user interaction (UI:R) and the absence of confidentiality or availability impact lower it. This score appropriately captures a vulnerability that is non-trivial to exploit but poses a real risk in high-risk network scenarios (public Wi-Fi, compromised ISP links). It does not reach HIGH or CRITICAL thresholds because active network control and user action are both required, and the impact is limited to integrity (content injection) rather than system compromise.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need a VPN to protect against this?

A VPN does not directly prevent the vulnerability, but it can reduce your attack surface by encrypting network traffic and routing it through a trusted endpoint. More importantly, a VPN prevents local network attackers (on the same Wi-Fi) from seeing or modifying your traffic. If you work on untrusted networks, a VPN combined with the patch is a strong mitigation strategy. However, the patch itself is the primary fix.

Could this be exploited by a compromised website alone?

No. A malicious website cannot exploit this vulnerability by itself. The attacker must be in a position to intercept or modify your network traffic. A regular phishing site, ad injection, or malware payload hosted on the web cannot trigger this flaw. This is why the attack is classified as network-level.

What does 'bypass CSP' mean for me as a user?

Content Security Policy is a browser security mechanism that websites use to prevent their pages from loading malicious scripts. When CSP is bypassed, an attacker can inject their own script into a page you are viewing, potentially stealing your passwords, session cookies, or personal information. The CSP bypass is a stepping stone; the real danger comes from what the attacker does with that capability.

Is my data encrypted on HTTPS against this attack?

HTTPS encrypts the content of your traffic but does not prevent network-level interception if an attacker can modify the encryption handshake or certificate validation. This vulnerability could potentially be exploited in combination with other network attacks. Patching is more reliable than relying on HTTPS alone for protection against this class of threat.

This analysis is based on publicly available information current as of the CVE publication date (June 30, 2026) and should not be considered as specific legal, compliance, or risk management advice. SEC.co does not conduct security testing or vulnerability confirmation; this summary is provided for informational purposes to support your organization's vulnerability management program. Always verify patch applicability and compatibility in your environment before deployment. For authoritative technical details, consult Google's official Chrome security advisory and your organization's security team. This analysis is not a substitute for a formal security assessment or threat modeling exercise specific to your organization's network and asset inventory. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-09. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).