CVE-2026-13581: Edimax EW-7478APC Remote Command Injection via rootAPmac Parameter
Edimax EW-7478APC wireless access point models running firmware version 1.04 contain a remote command injection flaw in the device's web interface. An authenticated attacker can send a specially crafted request to the POST handler at /goform/formStaDrvSetup, manipulating the rootAPmac parameter to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the device. This bypasses the device's normal administrative controls and allows an attacker to fully compromise the access point's security.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-77, CWE-78
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-29 / 2026-06-30
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability was detected in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. This vulnerability affects the function formStaDrvSetup of the file /goform/formStaDrvSetup of the component POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument rootAPmac results in os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
5 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-13581 is an OS command injection vulnerability in the Edimax EW-7478APC firmware 1.04. The POST request handler for formStaDrvSetup fails to properly sanitize the rootAPmac parameter before passing it to an OS command execution function. This results in CWE-77 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command) and CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command). The vulnerability requires valid authentication credentials but no elevated privileges, and can be exploited over the network without user interaction.
Business impact
Compromise of an Edimax EW-7478APC access point could allow attackers to intercept network traffic, redirect users to malicious sites, deploy persistent backdoors, or use the device as a pivot point into your corporate or home network. The attack surface widens considerably if the access point is internet-facing or accessible to untrusted users. For organizations managing multiple Edimax devices, this could represent a significant infrastructure risk if left unpatched.
Affected systems
Edimax EW-7478APC wireless access point running firmware version 1.04 is confirmed vulnerable. Organizations should verify whether they operate this specific model and firmware version in their network inventory. The vulnerability requires network access and valid login credentials, so devices behind firewalls or with strong access controls face lower immediate risk than those publicly accessible or used in shared/guest network environments.
Exploitability
While the vulnerability requires authenticated access to exploit, this is a practical barrier rather than a strong security boundary. Many access points ship with default credentials that often go unchanged, and credentials may be guessable or obtained through social engineering. Proof-of-concept details have been publicly disclosed, making exploitation straightforward for attackers once they gain initial authentication. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 (MEDIUM) reflects the authentication requirement; however, the actual risk depends heavily on credential hygiene and network segmentation in your environment.
Remediation
Immediately contact Edimax for available firmware updates or patches that address this command injection flaw. Given the vendor's reported non-responsiveness to early disclosure, patches may be delayed or unavailable. As interim mitigation, restrict network access to the device's web interface using firewall rules, network segmentation, or VPN-gated access. Change default administrative credentials to strong, unique passwords. Consider temporarily disabling remote management features if they are not essential. Monitor the device for suspicious activity and unusual command execution patterns.
Patch guidance
Check the Edimax support portal for your EW-7478APC model for firmware updates beyond 1.04. Verify patch availability against the official vendor advisory before applying. If no official patch is available, escalate to Edimax support and request a timeline. Until a fix is released, rely on network-layer controls (firewall rules, access restrictions, segmentation) to minimize exposure. Test any firmware updates in a non-production environment first.
Detection guidance
Monitor POST requests to /goform/formStaDrvSetup for unusual rootAPmac parameter values, especially those containing shell metacharacters (backticks, pipes, semicolons, ampersands, dollar signs, or parentheses). Check device logs for unexpected command execution, particularly from the web interface process. Use network intrusion detection systems to flag suspicious POST patterns. Review access logs for repeated authentication attempts or successful logins from unfamiliar IP addresses. Behavioral analysis of the access point's process execution tree may reveal injected commands distinct from normal firmware operations.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability combines network exploitability with command injection severity, making it a meaningful security concern despite the authentication requirement. The public disclosure and lack of vendor response increase urgency. Prioritize patching or isolating Edimax EW-7478APC devices, especially those in sensitive network locations (DMZ, guest networks, customer-facing). Organizations relying heavily on Edimax infrastructure should expedite inventory checks and access control reviews.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 (MEDIUM) reflects a remotely exploitable flaw with confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, tempered by the requirement for authenticated access. However, the actual risk in your environment may be higher if default credentials are in use, the device is internet-facing, or it sits in a trust zone with lateral movement potential. Conversely, risk may be lower if the device is firewalled, segregated, or already operating with strong access controls.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to patch immediately if my Edimax device is behind a firewall?
Firewall protection significantly reduces immediate risk, but does not eliminate it entirely. If an attacker gains legitimate credentials or compromises a trusted user's session, they could still exploit the flaw. Prioritize patching, but interim firewall-based access controls (IP whitelisting, VPN-gating) provide reasonable short-term protection while awaiting an official patch.
What should I do if Edimax does not release a patch for firmware 1.04?
If no patch becomes available, consider hardware replacement or migration to a different vendor's access point. In the interim, implement compensating controls: segment the device on an isolated VLAN, restrict CLI/web access to a whitelist of administrator IPs, disable remote management, and monitor activity closely. Document the risk acceptance decision with your security leadership.
Can this vulnerability be exploited without valid credentials?
No. The CVSS vector specifies PR:L (Privilege Level: Low), meaning the attacker must authenticate first. However, many access points ship with default usernames and passwords that are publicly known or easy to guess, effectively lowering the barrier to exploitation in practice.
Are other Edimax models or firmware versions affected?
Only firmware version 1.04 of the EW-7478APC is confirmed vulnerable by this CVE. However, similar command injection flaws may exist in other Edimax models or firmware versions. Review your inventory for similar devices and contact Edimax for a broader advisory on potentially affected models.
This analysis is based on disclosed vulnerability data and public information available as of the published date. Readers should verify patch availability and compatibility with their specific environment by consulting the vendor's official advisory and support channels. This document does not constitute professional security advice; organizations should conduct their own risk assessments in the context of their network architecture and threat model. Proof-of-concept information has been publicly disclosed; organizations should assume this vulnerability may be actively exploited and should prioritize remediation accordingly. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-08. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10279MEDIUMOS Command Injection in wezterm-mcp 0.1.0
- CVE-2026-11341MEDIUMD-Link DWR-M920 Command Injection Vulnerability – Patch & Detection Guide
- CVE-2026-11408MEDIUMOS Command Injection in vertex-app Log Viewer Endpoint
- CVE-2026-12814MEDIUMComfast CF-WR631AX V3 Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-12815MEDIUMOS Command Injection in Coolify 4.0.0 Image Name Handler
- CVE-2026-13560MEDIUMEdimax EW-7478APC Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-13561MEDIUMEdimax EW-7478APC Remote Command Injection Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-15033MEDIUMOS Command Injection in check-peer-dependencies npm Package