MEDIUM 6.3

CVE-2026-13579: SQL Injection in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in itsourcecode Hospital Management System version 1.0. An authenticated attacker can manipulate the password change function to execute arbitrary SQL queries. This allows an attacker with valid login credentials to read, modify, or delete patient data stored in the hospital's database. The vulnerability is in the /patientchangepassword.php file and requires no user interaction beyond the attacker sending a crafted request.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-74, CWE-89
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-29 / 2026-06-29

NVD description (verbatim)

A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /patientchangepassword.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument newpassword can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

6 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-13579 is a SQL injection flaw (CWE-89) combined with improper neutralization of special elements in input (CWE-74). The vulnerability exists in the newpassword parameter of the /patientchangepassword.php endpoint in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. The application fails to properly sanitize or parameterize SQL queries constructed from user-supplied input, allowing authenticated users to inject malicious SQL commands. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) reflects network-based exploitation requiring valid credentials, with low attack complexity and impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the database.

Business impact

For healthcare organizations deploying this system, the risk centers on patient data confidentiality and regulatory compliance. An insider threat or compromised employee account could be leveraged to exfiltrate protected health information (PHI), triggering HIPAA breach notification obligations. Beyond data theft, attackers could alter patient records—changing medication lists, allergies, or treatment history—creating patient safety risks and operational chaos. Database deletion or denial of service is also possible, disrupting clinical workflows. Reputational and financial consequences include regulatory fines and loss of patient trust.

Affected systems

itsourcecode Hospital Management System version 1.0 is confirmed affected. The specific endpoint /patientchangepassword.php is the attack vector. Organizations should verify whether they are running this exact version and whether it is exposed to network access. If no vendor product mapping has been published, contact itsourcecode directly to confirm scope and any subsequent patched versions.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires valid authentication credentials, which raises the bar for opportunistic attacks but lowers it for insider threats, credential compromise, or lateral movement scenarios. Public exploit code is available, meaning attack tools are accessible to less sophisticated threat actors. No user interaction is needed—an attacker with credentials can directly craft a malicious HTTP request to the vulnerable endpoint. The low attack complexity and network accessibility make this a practical risk in environments where employee accounts have been compromised or where access controls are weak.

Remediation

Immediately upgrade itsourcecode Hospital Management System to a patched version when available from the vendor. Verify the patch version number against the official itsourcecode security advisory. As an interim control, apply strict input validation and SQL parameterized queries (prepared statements) to the /patientchangepassword.php file if source code modification is feasible. Restrict network access to the password change endpoint using firewall rules or API gateways. Enforce multi-factor authentication to reduce the likelihood of valid credential compromise. Monitor database query logs for SQL injection patterns.

Patch guidance

Check the itsourcecode website and security advisories for an updated version of Hospital Management System that addresses CVE-2026-13579. Verify against the vendor advisory the specific version number that contains the fix before deploying. Test the patch in a non-production environment first to ensure compatibility with existing integrations and workflows. Schedule a maintenance window and plan for user communication, as the patch may require service interruption. Once patched, validate remediation by attempting the known injection payload against the updated system—it should be rejected.

Detection guidance

Monitor HTTP requests to /patientchangepassword.php for suspicious SQL syntax in the newpassword parameter, such as single quotes, SQL keywords (UNION, SELECT, DROP), comment characters (-- or /*), or encoded variants. Enable detailed logging of database queries and failed SQL parsing attempts. Search for error messages that leak SQL syntax or database structure. Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) configured with SQL injection rules to block malicious payloads. Review access logs for authenticated users accessing the password change endpoint from unusual times, locations, or with high frequency. Alert on any changes to user accounts, roles, or database schema that occur through the web interface.

Why prioritize this

Although CVSS 6.3 is rated MEDIUM, the healthcare context and patient safety implications warrant elevated attention. The presence of public exploit code, combined with the authentication requirement (which can be satisfied through credential theft or insider threat), makes this practically exploitable in realistic scenarios. Hospital systems are commonly targeted by threat actors seeking PHI and operational disruption. Organizations should treat this as HIGH priority for patching and compensating controls, despite the MEDIUM CVSS score.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 6.3 (MEDIUM) reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with low attack complexity but high friction from the authentication requirement (PR:L). The vector indicates limited impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability within the scope of the affected database. However, this score does not account for the high business impact of healthcare data breaches, the availability of public exploits, or the elevated insider threat risk in hospital environments. Organizations should supplement CVSS with business context and threat modeling specific to their environment and data sensitivity.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need to patch if we run version 1.0 but restrict network access to /patientchangepassword.php?

Network segmentation is a strong compensating control and reduces immediate risk, but it is not a substitute for patching. A compromised internal account, supply chain threat, or misconfigured firewall rule could still expose the endpoint. Patching is the definitive remediation; segmentation should be layered on top for defense-in-depth.

Can an attacker change another user's password with this vulnerability?

The attack vector targets the newpassword parameter, typically used in a self-service password reset. Depending on the application logic, an attacker with a valid account may be able to inject SQL to bypass authentication checks or manipulate the query to affect other accounts. Conduct a code review or penetration test of your specific deployment to determine the exact scope.

What should we do if we discover unauthorized database access or altered patient records?

Immediately isolate affected systems, preserve logs, and notify your security and compliance teams. Document the timeline and scope of access. Comply with breach notification laws (HIPAA, state breach laws, etc.) and consider engaging forensics specialists. Review and strengthen authentication, audit logging, and access controls on all clinical systems.

Is there a workaround if we cannot patch immediately?

Short-term mitigations include disabling the password change feature via the web interface and routing password resets through an alternative, validated system; enforcing MFA to reduce credential compromise; and applying strict WAF rules to block SQL injection attempts on that endpoint. However, these are temporary measures—schedule patching as soon as vendor updates are available.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical, or regulatory advice. Organizations must verify all patch versions and compatibility against official vendor advisories before deployment. The presence of public exploit code does not guarantee successful exploitation in your environment—actual risk depends on your network topology, access controls, and threat model. Consult your vendor, legal counsel, and compliance officer regarding breach notification obligations. This explainer is current as of the CVE publication date; check vendor advisories and security bulletins for updates. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-08. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).