CVE-2026-13578: SQL Injection in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0 – Healthcare Data Risk
A SQL injection vulnerability exists in itsourcecode Hospital Management System version 1.0 that allows authenticated users to manipulate the editid parameter in the patientdetail.php file, potentially compromising patient data confidentiality and integrity. The vulnerability requires valid login credentials but can be exploited remotely over the network. Public exploit code is already available, increasing the practical risk to deployed instances.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-74, CWE-89
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-29 / 2026-06-29
NVD description (verbatim)
A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /patientdetail.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument editid results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
6 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-13578 is a SQL injection flaw (CWE-89) stemming from improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands (CWE-74). The vulnerability exists in the /patientdetail.php endpoint where the editid parameter is passed directly into SQL queries without adequate parameterization or sanitization. An attacker with valid credentials can craft malicious SQL syntax in the editid argument to extract, modify, or delete database records. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 (MEDIUM severity) reflects the requirement for prior authentication, though the impact spans confidentiality, integrity, and availability of hospital data.
Business impact
Hospital Management Systems handle sensitive patient protected health information (PHI). A successful SQL injection attack could expose complete patient medical records, appointment histories, medication information, and billing data—creating compliance violations under HIPAA and similar healthcare data protection regulations. Beyond regulatory penalties, a data breach undermines patient trust and can trigger notification obligations and legal liability. In a healthcare context, even integrity-only attacks (data modification without exfiltration) pose patient safety risks if clinical records are altered maliciously.
Affected systems
itsourcecode Hospital Management System version 1.0 is confirmed affected. Organizations running this specific version—particularly smaller clinics, private practices, or regional health networks using this open-source or low-cost solution—should audit their deployment status immediately. The vendor product list in the advisory is empty; verify via your asset inventory and vendor communication whether patches or supported versions exist.
Exploitability
The vulnerability carries moderate exploitability barriers: an attacker must first obtain valid user credentials (via social engineering, credential reuse, insider access, or prior compromise). However, once authenticated, no additional user interaction is required and exploitation is straightforward using standard SQL injection techniques. The existence of public exploit code removes the need for custom payload development, lowering the technical barrier for opportunistic or organized threat actors. Healthcare environments are frequent ransomware and data theft targets, making this a concern despite the authentication requirement.
Remediation
Immediate actions: (1) Inventory all instances of Hospital Management System 1.0 and isolate them from critical networks if patches are unavailable; (2) Implement strict access controls on the /patientdetail.php endpoint via WAF rules or network segmentation; (3) Enable SQL query logging and anomaly detection to catch exploitation attempts; (4) Force password resets for all users with editid parameter access. Long-term: upgrade to a patched version if available from the vendor, or migrate to an alternative Hospital Management System with active security support. Verify patch availability and supported upgrade paths against vendor advisories before implementation.
Patch guidance
No specific patch version information is available in the current advisory. Contact itsourcecode directly to determine: (1) whether version 1.0 receives security updates; (2) the minimum safe version to upgrade to; (3) availability of security patches versus full version upgrades. If the vendor no longer supports version 1.0 or provides no patch, plan for system replacement or retirement as part of your healthcare IT modernization roadmap. Test any patches in a non-production environment first, particularly given the critical nature of hospital systems.
Detection guidance
Monitor /patientdetail.php access logs for unusual editid parameter values containing SQL metacharacters (single quotes, semicolons, SQL keywords like UNION, SELECT, OR 1=1). Set alerts for authentication successes followed immediately by multiple failed editid parameter submissions, which may indicate exploitation attempts. Database query logs should flag unexpected SELECT, UPDATE, or DELETE statements originating from the web application user account. Web Application Firewalls should block requests containing common SQL injection payloads in the editid parameter.
Why prioritize this
Despite a MEDIUM CVSS score, this vulnerability warrants high prioritization in healthcare environments because: (1) the target system handles PHI subject to strict regulatory oversight; (2) public exploits are available, reducing attacker technical skill requirements; (3) authentication requirements can be overcome in healthcare settings where user credentials are often shared or reused; (4) the impact extends to patient safety (data integrity), not just privacy. Organizations should treat this as a priority remediation item in Q3 2026, especially if their Hospital Management System is externally accessible.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 reflects: Attack Vector (Network—AV:N) indicating remote exploitability; Access Complexity (Low—AC:L) meaning no special conditions are needed; Privileges Required (Low—PR:L) indicating authenticated access is mandatory; User Interaction (None—UI:N) meaning no social engineering or clicks are required after authentication; and impact to Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (all Low—C:L/I:L/A:L) due to the limited scope within a single user session or database. In a healthcare risk context, the regulatory and safety implications elevate practical severity beyond the numerical score; security teams should apply healthcare-specific risk multipliers when prioritizing against other MEDIUM vulnerabilities in non-regulated applications.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need valid credentials to exploit this vulnerability?
Yes, the CVSS vector shows PR:L (Privileges Required: Low), meaning an attacker must first authenticate as a valid user. However, in healthcare environments, user credentials are sometimes shared among staff, reused across systems, or compromised through phishing, making this a lower barrier than it might be in other sectors.
What data could an attacker access if they exploit this?
An attacker can execute arbitrary SQL queries, potentially accessing, modifying, or deleting any data in the Hospital Management System database that the application's database user account can reach. This typically includes patient records, medical histories, appointment schedules, billing information, and staff credentials—all PHI subject to HIPAA and other regulations.
Is this vulnerability in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog?
No, this vulnerability is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog. However, public exploit code is available, and healthcare organizations remain high-value targets for ransomware and data theft groups. Do not wait for KEV inclusion; treat this as actively exploitable based on the availability of public proof-of-concept code.
Can a Web Application Firewall (WAF) protect me until I patch?
A WAF can significantly reduce risk by blocking common SQL injection payloads in the editid parameter and limiting access to /patientdetail.php to trusted IP ranges. However, a WAF is a temporary control and should not substitute for patching or upgrading. Use WAF rules as a bridge while you coordinate with your vendor on remediation timelines.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute security advice specific to your organization. No exploit code, weaponized proof-of-concept, or step-by-step attack instructions are provided. Verify all patch versions, vendor support timelines, and affected product details against official vendor advisories before taking remediation action. Healthcare organizations must coordinate patching with their compliance and clinical operations teams to minimize patient care disruptions. SEC.co and its analysts assume no liability for damages resulting from use or misuse of this information. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-08. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10155MEDIUMSQL Injection in Bdtask Multi-Store Inventory Management System 1.0
- CVE-2026-10170MEDIUMSQL Injection in code-projects Visitor Management System 1.0
- CVE-2026-10171MEDIUMSQL Injection in code-projects Online Music Site 1.0 AdminUpdateAlbum.php
- CVE-2026-10176MEDIUMSQL Injection in Aider-AI Aider 0.86.3 Code Generation
- CVE-2026-10193MEDIUMSQL Injection in OFCMS ComnController – Authentication Required
- CVE-2026-10202MEDIUMOFCMS 1.1.3 SQL Injection in SystemDictController
- CVE-2026-10203MEDIUMSQL Injection in OFCMS 1.1.3 JSON Query Interface
- CVE-2026-10204MEDIUMSQL Injection in OFCMS 1.1.3 JSON Query Interface