CVE-2026-13563: Edimax EW-7478APC Stack Buffer Overflow (CVSS 8.8)
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Edimax EW-7478APC wireless extender firmware version 1.04. The vulnerability is triggered when an attacker sends a specially crafted POST request to the L2TP setup endpoint, with an oversized username parameter that overwrites the call stack. An authenticated attacker can exploit this remotely to execute arbitrary code or crash the device. The vendor has not responded to early disclosure attempts, and the vulnerability details are now public.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-119, CWE-121
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-29 / 2026-06-29
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability has been found in Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04. This impacts the function formL2TPSetup of the file /goform/formL2TPSetup of the component POST Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument L2TPUserName leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
5 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-13563 is a stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-119, CWE-121) in the formL2TPSetup POST request handler of Edimax EW-7478APC firmware 1.04. The L2TPUserName parameter is not properly bounds-checked before being copied into a fixed stack buffer in the /goform/formL2TPSetup endpoint. This allows an authenticated network attacker to overflow the buffer, corrupt the return pointer, and achieve code execution with the privileges of the web server process. The vulnerability requires valid credentials (PR:L in CVSS terms) but can be executed over the network without user interaction.
Business impact
Organizations deploying Edimax EW-7478APC devices are at immediate risk of remote code execution. Compromised devices can become pivots for lateral movement into corporate networks, serve as botnets, or intercept and manipulate network traffic passing through them. Wireless extenders often sit on network perimeters with less monitoring than core infrastructure, making them attractive attack staging points. For managed service providers and enterprises with distributed branches, widespread exposure could require emergency device replacement or firmware isolation measures.
Affected systems
Edimax EW-7478APC firmware version 1.04 is confirmed vulnerable. Verify with your inventory whether this specific model and firmware version is deployed in your environment. Check Edimax advisory channels and documentation to determine if other EW-74xx variants or firmware versions are affected, as the vendor's non-responsiveness has prevented comprehensive clarity on the full scope.
Exploitability
This vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 (HIGH) with a network attack vector and low complexity. Exploitation requires authentication (login credentials), which limits opportunistic attacks but is not a significant barrier in environments where devices use default or weak credentials. Public disclosure of vulnerability details combined with the vendor's non-responsive posture increases the likelihood of active exploitation. No evidence of weaponized exploit code is documented, but the technical barrier to developing one is low given the straightforward nature of stack overflows.
Remediation
Immediately verify your inventory for Edimax EW-7478APC 1.04 devices. Contact Edimax support to inquire about available firmware updates; given the vendor's prior non-responsiveness, monitor their security advisories independently. If no patch is forthcoming within a defined incident response window, consider isolating affected devices to management VLANs only, restricting access to trusted administrators, or decommissioning them in favor of alternatives. Apply strong authentication credentials and disable remote management features if not operationally required.
Patch guidance
Check the Edimax support portal for firmware updates beyond version 1.04 for the EW-7478APC model. Due to the vendor's documented non-responsiveness, verify the authenticity of any update through official Edimax channels and validate checksums before deployment. If a patch is released, stage it in a test environment first. Absent a timely vendor patch, document the device's location, risk acceptance, and any compensating controls (network segmentation, credential hardening) for your security team and auditors.
Detection guidance
Monitor network logs for POST requests to /goform/formL2TPSetup endpoints on your Edimax devices. Alert on oversized L2TPUserName parameters or any L2TP configuration changes from unexpected sources. Enable authentication logging on affected devices and review for failed or suspicious credential use. Check device firmware version strings in management interfaces or via SNMP if enabled. Implement network-based anomaly detection for unusual data flows from wireless extender VLANs, which may indicate post-exploitation command and control activity.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits urgent attention due to its HIGH CVSS score (8.8), remote exploitability, and the vendor's non-responsive stance. While authentication is required, the combination of public disclosure, firmware stagnation, and typical weak default credentials on consumer-grade network devices means this threat can be weaponized quickly. Wireless extenders occupy a critical position in network topology with often-minimal visibility, making them valuable stepping stones for attackers.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflects high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H) combined with a remote network attack surface and low attack complexity. The authentication requirement (PR:L) prevents a 9.8+ rating but does not substantially reduce risk given widespread use of factory defaults. The public disclosure status and vendor non-responsiveness elevate the threat model beyond the base CVSS metric alone.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to apply a patch immediately if I don't have default credentials on my EW-7478APC?
Yes. While strong credentials reduce the attack surface, they are not a sufficient control in high-risk environments. Assume that credentials may be obtained through phishing, lateral movement, or other means. Prioritize patching or decommissioning the device. If patching is delayed, combine credential hardening with network segmentation.
The vendor hasn't released a patch. What should I do?
Document the device's location and risk profile for your audit trail. Implement compensating controls: restrict management access to a hardened jump host, place the device on a isolated VLAN, disable unnecessary services, and monitor for anomalous behavior. Set a deadline (e.g., 30–60 days) after which you will decommission the device if no patch emerges. Contact Edimax support regularly to pressure them for guidance.
How do I check my EW-7478APC firmware version?
Log into the device's web admin interface (typically 192.168.0.1 or similar), navigate to System Settings or Administration, and note the firmware version. If it is 1.04 or unclear, contact Edimax for an advisory. Document the serial number and deployment location for inventory tracking.
Could this vulnerability affect other Edimax models?
The vulnerability is confirmed in EW-7478APC 1.04. Related EW-74xx models may be vulnerable if they share the same L2TP handling code. Request a vendor security bulletin that lists all affected models. Until then, apply the same precautions to similar Edimax wireless extenders in your environment.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes and does not constitute legal or financial advice. CVSS scores and severity ratings are provided as-is and should be validated against authoritative sources. Patch version numbers, release dates, and vendor statements must be verified against official Edimax advisories. SEC.co assumes no liability for decisions made based on this content. Organizations must conduct their own risk assessments and apply controls appropriate to their security posture and regulatory obligations. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-08. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10062HIGHTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Stack Overflow – EOL Hardware Risk
- CVE-2026-10063HIGHTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Stack Overflow – End-of-Life Router Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10065HIGHShibby Tomato 1.28 Stack Buffer Overflow in tomatodata.cgi
- CVE-2026-10066HIGHShibby Tomato Stack Buffer Overflow in UPS Service (RCE)
- CVE-2026-10067HIGHShibby Tomato 1.28 Stack Buffer Overflow in multimon.cgi
- CVE-2026-10119HIGHStack Overflow in TRENDnet TEW-432BRP End-of-Life Router
- CVE-2026-10120HIGHTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Buffer Overflow – No Patch Available
- CVE-2026-10121HIGHTRENDnet TEW-432BRP Stack Buffer Overflow