MEDIUM 6.3

CVE-2026-13541: SQL Injection in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in itsourcecode Hospital Management System version 1.0, specifically in the doctor password change functionality. An authenticated user can manipulate the newpassword parameter in /doctorchangepassword.php to inject malicious SQL commands. This allows an attacker to read, modify, or delete database contents without requiring elevated privileges. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable and public exploit code has already been released, increasing the risk of active exploitation.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-74, CWE-89
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-29 / 2026-06-29

NVD description (verbatim)

A weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /doctorchangepassword.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument newpassword can lead to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

6 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability is a second-order SQL injection flaw (CWE-89) stemming from insufficient input validation on the newpassword parameter processed by /doctorchangepassword.php. The application fails to properly sanitize or parameterize user-supplied input before incorporating it into SQL queries. An authenticated attacker can craft malicious input containing SQL metacharacters or stacked queries to execute arbitrary database operations. The attack vector is network-accessible, requires valid credentials (PR:L), and produces no user interaction requirement. Confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the underlying database are all at risk.

Business impact

Hospital management systems hold sensitive patient data, staff credentials, appointment records, and clinical notes. A successful SQL injection attack could expose Protected Health Information (PHI) subject to HIPAA regulations, leading to mandatory breach notifications, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. Attackers may also modify patient records, delete audit logs, or insert unauthorized prescriptions. In healthcare environments, data integrity is critical—corrupted records can directly impact clinical decision-making and patient safety. The combination of public exploit availability and authenticated access requirement increases the likelihood of insider threats or lateral movement post-compromise.

Affected systems

itsourcecode Hospital Management System version 1.0 is confirmed vulnerable. The vulnerability requires an authenticated session, limiting the attack surface to users with valid login credentials. This includes doctors, administrators, nurses, and other staff members with system access. Organizations using version 1.0 of this system should immediately assess their deployment scope and user access controls.

Exploitability

The vulnerability is readily exploitable. Public exploit code is available, the attack requires only network access and valid authentication credentials, and no complex conditions must be met. The CVSS score of 6.3 (MEDIUM) reflects the authentication requirement; without it, this would score significantly higher. However, in a healthcare setting where user accounts are frequently distributed and shared credentials are common, the practical barrier to exploitation is lower than the score suggests. Active exploitation is possible given public tooling availability.

Remediation

Immediate mitigation requires upgrading to a patched version of itsourcecode Hospital Management System—verify the vendor's advisory for the specific version number addressing CVE-2026-13541. If an immediate patch is unavailable, implement database-level access controls restricting the application's SQL account to minimal required permissions, and deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with SQL injection detection rules targeting the /doctorchangepassword.php endpoint. Additionally, enforce strong authentication mechanisms and monitor for unusual database queries from the application user account.

Patch guidance

Contact itsourcecode directly for patch availability and timeline. Apply the patch to all instances of Hospital Management System 1.0 across your infrastructure. Before deployment, test the patch in a non-production environment to ensure compatibility with existing clinical workflows and integrations. Schedule patching during maintenance windows to minimize disruption. Verify patch installation by reviewing file integrity and confirming the vulnerable parameter handling has been corrected through code review or vendor documentation.

Detection guidance

Monitor database query logs for SQL syntax errors or unusual command structures originating from the application. Implement intrusion detection signatures targeting SQL injection patterns in HTTP requests to /doctorchangepassword.php, specifically patterns containing SQL keywords (UNION, SELECT, DROP, etc.) in the newpassword parameter. Alert on failed authentication attempts followed by exploitation attempts. Log and review all password change operations, flagging those with suspicious timing or originating from unusual network sources. Consider deploying application-level input validation logs to capture rejected malicious payloads.

Why prioritize this

While the CVSS score is MEDIUM (6.3), the criticality of healthcare data and the combination of public exploits, authentication requirement, and healthcare-specific regulatory obligations (HIPAA) elevate practical priority. The presence of public exploit code significantly shortens the window before automated attacks emerge. Authentication requirement is the primary factor preventing a CRITICAL rating, but in environments with weak access controls, this is a weak control. Healthcare organizations should treat this as HIGH priority for rapid patching.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 6.3 is assigned under CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L. Network availability (AV:N) and low attack complexity (AC:L) indicate ease of exploitation. The requirement for prior authentication (PR:L) prevents a higher score despite full CIA impact at LOW scope. The MEDIUM severity reflects the authentication gate; organizations with lax access controls or shared credentials should internally escalate this rating. The presence of public exploits does not alter the CVSS score but substantially increases practical exploitability risk.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need valid hospital staff credentials to exploit this vulnerability?

Yes. The vulnerability requires an authenticated session (PR:L in the CVSS vector), meaning an attacker must possess valid login credentials for a hospital staff account. However, this is a common exposure vector in healthcare environments where credentials may be shared, reused across systems, or compromised through phishing. Insider threats also present significant risk.

What data is at risk if this vulnerability is exploited?

The underlying database accessed by the Hospital Management System is at risk. This typically includes patient demographics, medical histories, appointment records, lab results, prescriptions, and staff credentials. Attackers can read, modify, or delete any data the application's database account has permission to access. Such breaches trigger HIPAA breach notification requirements.

Is there a temporary workaround if we cannot patch immediately?

There is no complete functional workaround, but mitigation steps include: restricting the application database account to read-only permissions where possible, implementing network-level access controls to limit who can reach /doctorchangepassword.php, deploying a WAF with SQL injection rules, and enforcing multi-factor authentication for all staff accounts to reduce credential compromise risk. These do not eliminate the vulnerability but reduce exploitation likelihood.

How should we prioritize this against other vulnerabilities in our environment?

Healthcare organizations should treat this as HIGH priority due to the combination of public exploits, direct access to sensitive PHI, and regulatory compliance risk. CVSS MEDIUM should not anchor your decision—factor in the presence of proof-of-concept code, your environment's authentication hygiene, and the reputational and legal consequences of a hospital data breach. If you operate Hospital Management System 1.0 with externally accessible endpoints, patch within days, not weeks.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes to assist security leaders in risk assessment and remediation planning. SEC.co does not verify the accuracy of vendor claims or patch availability timelines. Always consult the vendor's official security advisory and test patches in non-production environments before deployment. This intelligence does not constitute legal or compliance advice; healthcare organizations must coordinate remediation with compliance and clinical operations teams. No exploit code, proof-of-concept, or weaponized attack vectors are provided or endorsed. Patch versions, KEV status, and vendor product information referenced must be verified against official vendor sources and the National Vulnerability Database. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).