CVE-2026-13496: SQL Injection in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0
CVE-2026-13496 is a SQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Hospital Management System version 1.0. An authenticated user can manipulate the medicineid parameter in the /ajaxmedicine.php file to inject malicious SQL commands, potentially allowing them to read, modify, or delete database records. The vulnerability requires login credentials but can be exploited remotely over the network. Public exploit code is available, increasing the practical risk.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-74, CWE-89
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-28 / 2026-06-29
NVD description (verbatim)
A vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /ajaxmedicine.php. The manipulation of the argument medicineid results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
6 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists in an unspecified function within /ajaxmedicine.php where the medicineid parameter is not properly sanitized before being incorporated into SQL queries. This classic SQL injection (CWE-89) results from insufficient input validation (CWE-74). An authenticated attacker can craft a specially formatted medicineid value to break out of the intended SQL context and execute arbitrary database commands. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 reflects a network-accessible attack requiring valid credentials, with potential impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability of hospital data.
Business impact
For healthcare organizations using this system, successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive patient medical records, modification of medication information with serious clinical consequences, or deletion of critical hospital data. The availability of public exploits significantly accelerates the timeline to widespread abuse. In a healthcare context, even limited SQL injection can create patient safety risks if medication records are corrupted or inaccessible during clinical decision-making.
Affected systems
itsourcecode Hospital Management System version 1.0 is confirmed affected. Organizations running this specific version should assume they are at risk. The vendor and product information in the CVE record does not list extended version coverage, so verify with itsourcecode whether other versions contain the same flaw or if this is isolated to version 1.0.
Exploitability
This vulnerability has moderate-to-practical exploitability. It requires valid system credentials (authentication), which raises the barrier compared to unauthenticated attacks. However, the presence of publicly disclosed exploit code, combined with network accessibility and straightforward SQL injection mechanics, means threat actors with internal access or compromised credentials can weaponize it quickly. The lack of complex preconditions makes it attractive to insiders or attackers who have obtained legitimate user accounts.
Remediation
Immediate action is required: contact itsourcecode to determine if a patched version is available. If available, plan an upgrade of the Hospital Management System to the fixed release. In parallel, implement database-level mitigations: use prepared statements and parameterized queries throughout the application, restrict database user privileges to the minimum necessary, and enable SQL query logging and anomaly detection. Apply principle of least privilege to application service accounts.
Patch guidance
Verify the latest available version of itsourcecode Hospital Management System directly from the vendor's advisory or website. The source data does not specify a fixed version number, so you must confirm patch availability with itsourcecode before deployment. If a patch exists, test it in a non-production environment that mimics your hospital's database and clinical workflows. Given the critical nature of hospital systems, coordinate the upgrade with clinical and IT leadership to minimize operational disruption.
Detection guidance
Monitor /ajaxmedicine.php access logs for unusual parameter values in medicineid, particularly those containing SQL syntax characters (quotes, dashes, UNION, SELECT, etc.). Enable database query logging and look for unexpected or malformed SQL statements originating from the application. Consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) rule that blocks common SQL injection patterns in HTTP request parameters. Hospital IT teams should also audit user account activity to detect insider access anomalies.
Why prioritize this
Although not yet on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, this vulnerability warrants prompt attention because: (1) public exploit code is available, (2) it affects a healthcare system where data integrity directly impacts patient safety, (3) authentication requirement does not eliminate risk in environments where credentials are shared or weak, and (4) SQL injection in a hospital context can corrupt or expose Protected Health Information (PHI). The CVSS 6.3 MEDIUM rating should not be mistaken for low urgency in healthcare.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 (MEDIUM severity) reflects: Network-accessible attack vector (AV:N), low attack complexity (AC:L), and requirement for authenticated privileges (PR:L). The impact is limited to one or more of confidentiality, integrity, or availability (C:L/I:L/A:L), not a complete breach. The MEDIUM rating acknowledges that authentication is required but does not fully capture the amplified clinical and regulatory risk in healthcare. Organizations should not interpret MEDIUM as low-priority in this context; hospital-specific risk models should elevate this based on PHI exposure and patient safety implications.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to apply this patch immediately if our Hospital Management System is behind a firewall and only accessible to staff?
Yes. Internal threat actors, compromised staff credentials, and lateral movement from other breached systems make network perimeter protection insufficient. The authentication requirement only slightly reduces risk in a hospital environment. Patching should be scheduled as soon as feasible, prioritized by your incident response team.
What is the difference between this vulnerability and others rated MEDIUM?
CVSS rating is a technical severity baseline; business context determines actual urgency. A MEDIUM vulnerability in a non-critical system may be low priority, but the same rating in a hospital medication system carries higher organizational risk due to patient safety, regulatory (HIPAA), and liability factors. Always contextualize CVSS scores within your environment.
Is this vulnerability exploitable by remote attackers without a hospital user account?
No. The vulnerability requires valid login credentials. However, that does not mean it is low-risk. Insiders, users with weak passwords, and attackers who compromise credentials through phishing or lateral movement can exploit it. A robust identity and access management program reduces but does not eliminate this threat.
Will upgrading the Hospital Management System break our existing clinical workflows or integrations?
Test all upgrades in a staging environment before production deployment. Coordinate with clinical, IT, and vendor teams to verify that the patch does not introduce breaking changes to existing integrations, reports, or interfaces. Hospital system upgrades require thorough validation due to patient safety implications.
This analysis is based on publicly available CVE data current as of the publication date. Vendor and patch information should be verified directly against official itsourcecode advisories before any remediation action. SEC.co does not provide formal risk assessments or legal advice; healthcare organizations should consult their internal security teams and legal counsel regarding compliance obligations (HIPAA, state laws) when managing patient data vulnerabilities. The presence of public exploits does not guarantee successful weaponization in all environments; actual risk depends on network segmentation, access controls, and credential hygiene at your organization. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10155MEDIUMSQL Injection in Bdtask Multi-Store Inventory Management System 1.0
- CVE-2026-10170MEDIUMSQL Injection in code-projects Visitor Management System 1.0
- CVE-2026-10171MEDIUMSQL Injection in code-projects Online Music Site 1.0 AdminUpdateAlbum.php
- CVE-2026-10176MEDIUMSQL Injection in Aider-AI Aider 0.86.3 Code Generation
- CVE-2026-10193MEDIUMSQL Injection in OFCMS ComnController – Authentication Required
- CVE-2026-10202MEDIUMOFCMS 1.1.3 SQL Injection in SystemDictController
- CVE-2026-10203MEDIUMSQL Injection in OFCMS 1.1.3 JSON Query Interface
- CVE-2026-10204MEDIUMSQL Injection in OFCMS 1.1.3 JSON Query Interface