MEDIUM 5.3

CVE-2026-12025: Cross-Origin Data Leak in Google Chrome via Network Input Validation Flaw

Google Chrome versions before 149.0.7827.115 contain a flaw in how the browser validates input within its Network component. An attacker who has already compromised Chrome's renderer process—the sandboxed environment that executes web content—can craft a malicious HTML page to leak sensitive data across security boundaries that normally prevent one website from accessing another's information. This is a privilege-escalation scenario: it requires the renderer to already be compromised, but then allows the attacker to exfiltrate data that should be protected by the browser's same-origin policy.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 5.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-20
Affected products
4 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-11 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.115 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-12025 is a cross-origin data leak vulnerability stemming from insufficient input validation in Chrome's Network component (CWE-20). The vulnerability exists in the renderer process, which is already sandboxed by design. However, weak validation of untrusted network input allows a post-compromise attacker to bypass same-origin protections and access data from other origins via a crafted HTML payload. The Chromium security team assigned this a High severity rating despite the CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 (Medium), reflecting the sensitivity of cross-origin data exposure in a browser context. Exploitation requires user interaction (visiting a malicious page) and an already-compromised renderer process, which raises the attack complexity.

Business impact

The practical risk is limited because exploitation requires two conditions: renderer process compromise and user interaction with a malicious site. In targeted attacks against high-value users (researchers, journalists, government officials), an attacker who has already achieved renderer compromise via another vulnerability can use this flaw to harvest sensitive data from other open tabs or windows—potentially including authentication tokens, personal information, or confidential documents. For most organizations, this is a secondary concern after preventing the initial renderer compromise, but for users handling sensitive cross-origin workflows, this multiplies damage from a single browser exploit.

Affected systems

Google Chrome prior to version 149.0.7827.115 is the primary affected application. The vulnerability's scope extends to all supported operating systems: Windows, macOS, and Linux distributions. This is a Chromium-based flaw, so Chromium itself and other Chromium-derived browsers may also be affected; consult vendor advisories for Chrome-based alternatives (Edge, Opera, Brave, etc.). The listing of Linux kernel and operating systems in the affected vendors reflects the cross-platform nature of Chrome, not separate kernel or OS vulnerabilities.

Exploitability

Exploitation is moderately difficult. The attacker must first compromise the Chrome renderer process through an unrelated vulnerability, then craft an HTML page that the user visits. The CVSS vector reflects this: AC:H (high complexity) and UI:R (user interaction required) lower the score despite the confidentiality impact. There is no known public exploit or active exploitation in the wild (not in CISA KEV catalog). An attacker with renderer-level code execution can reliably trigger the data leak once the user navigates to the malicious page, but obtaining renderer compromise in the first place is the harder step.

Remediation

Update Google Chrome to version 149.0.7827.115 or later as soon as feasible. For organizations managing Chrome deployments, use Chrome Enterprise policies to enforce auto-updates or staged rollouts. Since exploitation requires renderer compromise plus user interaction, prioritize patching systems where high-value targets work with sensitive cross-origin data. Interim mitigations (sandboxing, user education on phishing) address the renderer compromise vector but do not directly patch this flaw.

Patch guidance

Chrome auto-updates by default; most users will receive version 149.0.7827.115 within days of release. Enterprise administrators should verify deployment via chrome://version or via management console dashboards. No backwards compatibility issues are expected. Test the update in a staging environment if your organization depends on legacy web applications, though this is a minor Network component fix unlikely to cause regression. Verify the update reaches all devices, including mobile Chrome on Android and iOS (which have separate version tracking).

Detection guidance

Network-level detection is limited because the flaw manifests as a renderer-process-level input validation bypass. Behavioral detection focuses on (1) signs of renderer compromise (unexpected child processes, unusual system calls from chrome.exe/chrome), and (2) suspicious cross-origin data flows (unusual API calls exfiltrating data to unexpected domains). Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools should monitor Chrome process behavior and network connections; YARA or similar signature tools can flag known renderer exploits. Log Chrome update status to ensure 149.0.7827.115+ is deployed. Network-based indicators are difficult to define without access to the specific payload signature.

Why prioritize this

While the CVSS score is 5.3 (Medium), the vulnerability merits prompt patching because: (1) it directly impacts data confidentiality across same-origin boundaries, a core browser security model; (2) exploitation chain involves renderer compromise, which may be achieved through other high-impact flaws; and (3) targeted campaigns could chain this with a renderer exploit to escalate damage. However, it is not a critical emergency because it requires two stages and user interaction. Prioritize based on your organization's exposure to targeted attacks and the sensitivity of data accessed in users' browsers.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 reflects a Medium severity vulnerability with high confidentiality impact (C:H) but no integrity or availability impact. The High attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R) prevent a higher score despite the sensitivity of the exposure. The Chromium team's separate 'High' severity assessment emphasizes the browser security context: leaking cross-origin data violates a fundamental security invariant, even if practical exploitation is constrained. For risk prioritization, treat this as moderate-to-high given the potential for chained exploits and the nature of browser-based data exposure.

Frequently asked questions

Does this vulnerability affect me if I'm not running Chrome?

Not directly. If you use Chromium-based browsers (Edge, Opera, Brave, Vivaldi), check your vendor's security advisories for patched versions. Firefox, Safari, and other non-Chromium browsers are not affected by this specific flaw, though they may have their own input validation issues.

Can an attacker exploit this without first compromising my renderer?

No. The vulnerability requires the attacker to already have code execution in the Chrome renderer process. This typically means they exploited another Chrome vulnerability first. Patching Chrome reduces both the initial attack surface and this secondary data-leak risk.

What kind of data can be leaked across origins?

Any data accessible to the browser and rendered in other origins: authentication cookies, session tokens, personal information from other websites, cached credentials, and potentially sensitive documents. The exact data depends on what the user has open and what the attacker's payload requests.

Is there an exploit public, and should I be worried about drive-by attacks?

No public exploit is known, and the vulnerability is not yet in CISA's KEV catalog. However, do not rely on obscurity; treat any unpatched Chrome as vulnerable to future exploits. Drive-by attacks are theoretically possible if an attacker combines this with a renderer exploit, but would require sophisticated multi-stage tactics.

This analysis is based on the CVE record and Chromium security advisory as of June 2026. Patch versions and availability may vary by platform and region. Consult Google's official Chrome security advisory and your organization's patch management policy before deploying updates. This page does not constitute legal or compliance advice. Organizations subject to regulatory requirements (PCI-DSS, HIPAA, etc.) should verify Chrome patch status as part of their security controls. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-20. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).