MEDIUM 5.3

CVE-2026-11098: Chrome GPU Input Validation Flaw Enabling Cross-Origin Data Leakage

Google Chrome versions prior to 149.0.7827.53 contain a flaw in GPU handling that allows an attacker with control of the renderer process to extract sensitive data from other websites. The vulnerability requires user interaction and a compromised renderer, making it a targeted risk rather than a mass-exploitation vector. The issue stems from insufficient validation when processing untrusted input, permitting cross-origin information disclosure.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 5.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-20
Affected products
4 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-04 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)

2 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-11098 is an input validation defect (CWE-20) in Chrome's GPU subsystem. The vulnerability allows a threat actor who has already compromised the renderer process to construct malicious HTML that triggers improper data handling in GPU operations. This enables leakage of cross-origin data—information normally protected by the same-origin policy. The attack chain requires prior renderer compromise and user interaction with a crafted page, substantially limiting the practical attack surface compared to pre-auth remote code execution flaws.

Business impact

If an attacker gains control of a user's Chrome renderer process through a separate vulnerability or malware, this flaw could be chained to exfiltrate sensitive cross-origin data such as authentication tokens, personal information, or corporate data from other open tabs. The real-world impact depends on whether an initial renderer compromise vector exists in your environment. Organizations with strict content security policies and limited malware exposure face lower risk; those with high-risk user populations (developers, researchers handling untrusted content) should prioritize mitigation.

Affected systems

Google Chrome on Windows, macOS, and Linux distributions running versions before 149.0.7827.53 are affected. The vulnerability is not specific to a single OS, reflecting Chrome's cross-platform architecture. All three major operating systems must be updated to eliminate exposure. Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows Chrome users represent the largest deployment base for most enterprises.

Exploitability

This vulnerability requires multiple preconditions: (1) prior compromise of the renderer process, (2) user interaction with a malicious HTML page, and (3) target to actively browse to attacker-controlled content. These requirements significantly reduce exploitability compared to a remote code execution. The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 (Medium) reflects high confidentiality impact offset by high attack complexity and the need for user interaction. It is not listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no current evidence of widespread exploitation in the wild.

Remediation

Update Google Chrome to version 149.0.7827.53 or later across all affected systems. The patch addresses the input validation defect in the GPU module. Ensure auto-update is enabled so future Chrome releases are deployed without manual intervention. Additionally, reinforce endpoint security practices that reduce the likelihood of initial renderer compromise—such as sandboxing untrusted content, limiting malware exposure, and using modern browser isolation technologies where feasible.

Patch guidance

Verify that Chrome auto-update is enabled in your environment (Settings > About Chrome on Windows/macOS/Linux). Chrome typically updates automatically and restarts the browser; users may see prompts to relaunch. For managed deployments, consult your organization's Chrome policy controller (Google Admin, MDM, or similar). Confirm deployed version is 149.0.7827.53 or higher via chrome://version or equivalent. No manual intervention or special configuration is required post-patch; the fix is automatic once the update is applied.

Detection guidance

Monitor for Chrome versions below 149.0.7827.53 using endpoint asset management or MDM tools. Flag systems that have disabled auto-update. Review browser process logs for suspicious GPU-related operations or renderer restarts following suspicious navigation—however, this is difficult to detect post-facto without deep GPU telemetry. The most practical detection is inventory-based: ensure all Chrome instances are at or above the patched version. Consider periodic scanning of user machines to identify outdated Chrome builds.

Why prioritize this

Although the CVSS score is Medium (5.3), the practical risk is lower than the score alone suggests due to the requirement for prior renderer compromise. Prioritize patching in cohorts: first, systems used by high-risk users (developers, security researchers, journalists); second, general enterprise endpoints; third, consumer devices. Since Chrome auto-updates by default, most users will be protected automatically within days of the patch release. Manual prioritization is most relevant for organizations with auto-update disabled or managed Chrome deployments on a slower release cycle.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.3 (Medium severity) reflects a high confidentiality impact (data disclosure) but is tempered by high attack complexity and the requirement for user interaction (UI:R) and prior renderer process compromise. The attack vector is network-based (AV:N), the scope is unchanged (S:U), and there is no integrity or availability impact. The score correctly captures that while cross-origin data leakage is serious, the attack prerequisites are substantial enough to prevent it from receiving a High or Critical rating.

Frequently asked questions

Does this vulnerability allow attackers to compromise Chrome without first controlling the renderer?

No. The flaw requires that an attacker has already compromised the renderer process through a separate vulnerability or malware infection. It is a post-compromise attack that amplifies the damage of an initial breach by enabling cross-origin data theft, but it does not itself serve as a remote code execution vector.

Is this vulnerability being actively exploited in the wild?

No. The vulnerability is not listed on the CISA KEV catalog as of the last update, meaning there is no public evidence of active exploitation. However, this does not guarantee zero risk; targeted or undisclosed exploitation is always possible. Monitor for patch adoption and stay informed through vendor security bulletins.

What is the difference between this GPU validation flaw and other Chrome sandbox escapes?

This vulnerability is not a sandbox escape; it is confined to the renderer process and focuses on GPU input validation. It does not grant system-level access or cross-process privilege escalation. Its impact is limited to information disclosure between websites, making it less severe than full sandbox escapes but still worth patching promptly.

Should we disable GPU acceleration in Chrome to mitigate this risk?

Disabling GPU acceleration would eliminate this specific attack surface, but it is not recommended as a general mitigation because GPU acceleration improves browser performance and security in other contexts. Patching to version 149.0.7827.53 or later is the proper fix. Focus instead on reducing the likelihood of initial renderer compromise through endpoint security and user awareness.

This analysis is based on publicly available CVE information and vendor disclosures as of June 2026. Patch version numbers and KEV status should be verified against the official Google Chrome security advisory and CISA sources before taking action. Organizations should perform their own risk assessment based on their specific Chrome deployment posture, endpoint security controls, and user population. This vulnerability is theoretical until patched; real-world impact depends on the existence of practical renderer compromise vectors in your threat model. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-12. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).