CVE-2026-10817: NetScaler ADC/Gateway Memory Disclosure via TCP TimeStamp – HIGH Severity
NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway are vulnerable to a memory disclosure attack when TCP TimeStamp functionality is enabled on TCP profiles associated with load balancing, content switching, VPN virtual servers, or services. An attacker on the network can trigger insufficient input validation to read sensitive data from memory without requiring authentication or user interaction. The vulnerability exposes confidential information but does not allow system disruption or modification.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.5 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-125
- Affected products
- 5 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-30 / 2026-07-02
NVD description (verbatim)
Insufficient input validation leading to memory overread in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway if the TCP TimeStamp is enabled in TCP Profile and is associated with the virtual server (of type LB, CS, VPN) or the service configured on NetScaler
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-10817 is a CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read) vulnerability affecting Citrix NetScaler deployments where TCP TimeStamp is configured in the TCP Profile and linked to a virtual server or service. The flaw stems from inadequate input validation in the TCP TimeStamp processing logic, permitting an unauthenticated remote attacker to craft packets that cause the NetScaler instance to read and potentially leak memory contents. The attack vector is network-based with low complexity and requires no privileges or user interaction, making it straightforward to exploit against exposed instances.
Business impact
This vulnerability enables unauthorized information disclosure from NetScaler memory, which may contain sensitive session tokens, configuration data, or cryptographic material. For organizations using NetScaler as a gateway or load balancer, compromise of in-transit secrets could facilitate downstream lateral movement, session hijacking, or credential theft. The exposure is particularly acute for VPN deployments where authentication tokens and user data transit the affected appliance. Regulatory compliance frameworks (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2) typically classify memory disclosure of protected data as a material breach trigger.
Affected systems
Citrix NetScaler Application Delivery Controller (ADC) and NetScaler Gateway are impacted. The vulnerability is conditional: it only manifests when TCP TimeStamp is explicitly enabled in a TCP Profile and that profile is associated with a virtual server (Load Balancing, Content Switching, or VPN type) or a backend service. Organizations without TCP TimeStamp enabled are not at risk. Verify your NetScaler configuration to determine if TCP TimeStamp is active on production virtual servers.
Exploitability
Exploitability is high due to the combination of network accessibility, no authentication requirement, and low attack complexity. An attacker requires only network access to the NetScaler instance and the ability to send crafted TCP packets. No special tools or insider knowledge is necessary. However, successful exploitation requires that the target configuration includes TCP TimeStamp in an active TCP Profile; this configuration is not universal across all NetScaler deployments, which may limit the overall exposure in some environments.
Remediation
Citrix has released security updates addressing this vulnerability. Organizations should prioritize patching across all affected NetScaler ADC and Gateway instances. As an interim mitigation, disable TCP TimeStamp in TCP Profiles unless it is operationally essential. Network segmentation to restrict unauthenticated access to NetScaler management and service interfaces can reduce attack surface. Review NetScaler access logs for evidence of suspicious packet patterns or error indicators following exploitation attempts.
Patch guidance
Consult Citrix's official security advisory for specific version numbers and patch availability across NetScaler ADC and Gateway product lines. Apply patches in a staged rollout, testing in non-production environments first to validate compatibility with existing configurations. Patching should be prioritized for internet-facing or VPN-gateway NetScaler instances. After patching, verify that TCP TimeStamp functionality operates as expected and that no configuration changes are required.
Detection guidance
Monitor NetScaler logs for malformed TCP TimeStamp processing errors or memory access violations correlated with TCP profile activity. Network-based detection is challenging without signatures; however, Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS) should flag abnormal TCP TimeStamp option handling or repeated failed packet processing from untrusted sources. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools monitoring the NetScaler OS can identify unexpected memory access patterns. Threat hunting should focus on correlating suspicious TCP activity with virtual server access logs and any historical data exfiltration indicators.
Why prioritize this
Despite not being on the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, this vulnerability warrants urgent remediation due to its CVSS 7.5 HIGH score, unauthenticated network exploitability, and information disclosure impact. NetScaler ADC and Gateway are critical infrastructure components handling sensitive user and transaction data; memory disclosure from these systems represents a material risk to confidentiality. The conditional nature of the vulnerability (requiring TCP TimeStamp enablement) should not lower priority—many deployments do enable this feature for performance monitoring. Organizations should treat patching as a critical path item.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 (HIGH) reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with no privilege or user interaction requirements (AV:N, AC:L, PR:N, UI:N). The impact vector emphasizes confidentiality loss (C:H) with no integrity or availability impact (I:N, A:N), consistent with a memory disclosure flaw. The score does not account for the conditional enablement of TCP TimeStamp; however, given the prevalence of this feature in performance-sensitive deployments, the score appropriately reflects real-world risk. Organizations with TCP TimeStamp disabled may evaluate risk differently, but proof of configuration should be independently verified.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability affect all NetScaler deployments?
No. The vulnerability only manifests if TCP TimeStamp is enabled in a TCP Profile that is associated with an active virtual server or service. If your organization does not use TCP TimeStamp, you are not exposed. Verify your TCP Profile configuration in NetScaler to confirm enablement status.
Can this vulnerability lead to remote code execution or system compromise?
No. CVE-2026-10817 is limited to information disclosure through memory overread. It does not permit code execution, privilege escalation, or denial of service. However, disclosed information (such as session tokens or configuration data) could be leveraged by an attacker for follow-on attacks against downstream systems.
Is this vulnerability currently being exploited in the wild?
As of the publication date, this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, indicating no confirmed active exploitation has been publicly disclosed. However, the ease of exploitation and high-value nature of NetScaler instances make proactive patching essential to prevent future campaigns.
What should we do if we cannot patch immediately?
Implement compensating controls: (1) Disable TCP TimeStamp in TCP Profiles if operationally feasible, (2) Restrict network access to NetScaler instances using firewall rules and network segmentation, (3) Monitor logs aggressively for signs of exploitation, and (4) Prioritize patching in your change management pipeline. Do not remain unpatched indefinitely.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes based on publicly disclosed vulnerability data. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the completeness or accuracy of vendor-specific patch details; consult Citrix's official security advisory and your vendor contacts for authoritative patch information and testing guidance. Testing of patches should occur in isolated non-production environments before production deployment. Organizations are responsible for assessing their own exposure and remediation timelines in accordance with their risk management policies and regulatory obligations. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-09. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-8451HIGHNetScaler SAML IDP Memory Over-Read Vulnerability – Assessment & Patch Guidance
- CVE-2025-41278HIGHWaterfall WF-500 RX Host Out-of-Bounds Read Remote Code Execution
- CVE-2025-7002HIGHAvira Antivirus Heap Buffer Vulnerability – Local Code Execution & DoS Risk
- CVE-2025-7003HIGHAvira Antivirus Heap Buffer Overflow – Patch Guide
- CVE-2025-7008HIGHAvast, AVG, Norton Antivirus Heap Buffer Vulnerability – Patch Guide
- CVE-2025-7009HIGHHeap Buffer Overflow in Avast, AVG, Norton Antivirus – Patch Now
- CVE-2025-7011HIGHAvast, AVG, Norton Antivirus Heap Overflow in Zip Scanning
- CVE-2025-7017HIGHAvira Antivirus Engine Heap Corruption – Patch & Detection Guide