MEDIUM 6.3

CVE-2026-10809: SQL Injection in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0

CVE-2026-10809 is a SQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Fees Management System version 1.0. An authenticated attacker can manipulate the ID parameter in the /manage_user.php file to inject malicious SQL commands, potentially reading, modifying, or deleting database records. The flaw requires valid login credentials but can be exploited over the network without user interaction. Public exploit code is available, elevating the practical risk despite the medium CVSS score.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-74, CWE-89
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-04 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /manage_user.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

6 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation on the ID parameter passed to /manage_user.php. The application fails to properly sanitize or parameterize SQL queries, allowing an attacker with valid credentials to inject arbitrary SQL syntax. This maps to CWE-89 (SQL Injection) and CWE-74 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output). The attack surface is limited to authenticated users (CVSS PR:L), but the impact spans confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the underlying database. Network-accessible deployment is the default assumption for web applications of this type.

Business impact

Compromise of the Fees Management System database could expose student financial records, payment histories, and personal information. An attacker could alter tuition balances, delete transaction records, or disrupt billing operations. For educational institutions relying on this system, data integrity loss could cascade into financial reporting errors, regulatory compliance issues, and reputational damage. The availability impact may force service disruption if the database becomes corrupted or locked by malicious queries.

Affected systems

itsourcecode Fees Management System version 1.0 is explicitly vulnerable. Organizations running this version in production are at immediate risk. The web-based nature of the application means any internet-facing or intranet-accessible instance is a potential attack vector. Legacy deployments that have not been upgraded should be prioritized for remediation.

Exploitability

Exploitation requires valid login credentials, which raises the bar slightly compared to unauthenticated flaws. However, weak credential hygiene, shared accounts, or compromised user credentials lower this barrier in practice. Public exploit code is available, meaning attackers do not need advanced reverse-engineering skills. The straightforward nature of SQL injection and the absence of complex exploitation chains make this highly exploitable by a moderately skilled attacker with internal access or valid account compromise.

Remediation

Immediately upgrade to a patched version of itsourcecode Fees Management System (verify against the vendor advisory for the specific build number). If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement database-level access controls to restrict the service account to read-only or minimal-privilege operations on non-sensitive tables. Apply strict input validation and parameterized queries (prepared statements) to all dynamic SQL in /manage_user.php. Consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) rule set to detect and block SQL injection patterns in the ID parameter.

Patch guidance

Contact itsourcecode for availability of patched releases and follow their official upgrade documentation. Prior to patching, audit database access logs for signs of exploitation (unusual query patterns, failed authentication attempts, or unexpected data modifications). Test patches in a non-production environment first, given the critical nature of fees management systems. Verify that the patch addresses all SQL injection entry points, not just the /manage_user.php ID parameter.

Detection guidance

Monitor for SQL syntax keywords (SELECT, UNION, INSERT, DELETE, DROP) in the ID parameter of requests to /manage_user.php. Log and alert on failed SQL statements or database errors that may indicate injection attempts. Check for unusual database user queries or privilege escalation attempts originating from the application service account. Review database transaction logs for unexpected modifications to user or financial records, particularly after failed login attempts or unusual access patterns.

Why prioritize this

Although the CVSS score is medium (6.3), the combination of public exploit code, web-accessible deployment, and direct access to sensitive financial data elevates practical risk. Authentication requirement mitigates but does not eliminate urgency, especially if credential compromise or insider threat is a concern. Fees Management Systems are often mission-critical, making even partial data corruption operationally damaging. This should rank in the upper-medium priority tier for patching within 30 days.

Risk score, explained

CVSS 6.3 reflects the requirement for prior authentication (PR:L) and lack of complexity in exploitation (AC:L). The score appropriately penalizes a flaw that does not require user interaction or special network conditions. However, the availability of public exploits and the sensitivity of financial data managed by the affected system justify treating this as higher priority than the base score alone suggests. Context-dependent factors—such as whether the system is internet-facing or serves a regulated entity—should inform internal prioritization.

Frequently asked questions

Do I need to be logged in to exploit this vulnerability?

Yes, the vulnerability requires valid authentication credentials. However, this does not eliminate risk if user accounts are weak, shared, or compromised. Attackers often target lower-privileged accounts or use credential stuffing. The authentication requirement does make mass internet-wide scanning impractical, but targeted attacks on known instances are feasible.

What data is most at risk?

The Fees Management System database is the primary target. Attackers could access student financial records, payment transaction histories, tuition balances, and personally identifiable information. They could also modify records to alter balances or delete audit trails, creating compliance and financial reporting problems.

Can a WAF fully protect us without patching?

A WAF is a valuable interim control and can block many SQL injection patterns targeting the ID parameter. However, it is not a substitute for patching. WAF rules can be bypassed with encoding tricks or alternative injection techniques, and they add operational overhead. Patching should remain the primary objective.

Is itsourcecode Fees Management System actively maintained?

That depends on your service agreement with itsourcecode. Contact the vendor directly to confirm support status, expected patch availability, and whether version 1.0 is still receiving security updates. If the vendor has end-of-lifed the product, you may need to plan for migration or accept elevated residual risk.

This analysis is for informational purposes and does not constitute professional security advice or endorsement. Organizations should conduct their own risk assessments and consult with itsourcecode or qualified security practitioners before deploying patches or changes. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding exploit availability, patch timing, or applicability of mitigations to specific deployments. Always test patches in non-production environments first. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).