CVE-2026-10540: Control-M Enterprise Manager Weak Password Hash Protection
Control-M/Enterprise Manager versions 9.0.20.x and earlier use cryptographic hashing methods that do not meet modern security standards for protecting stored user passwords. If an attacker gains access to the credential database—through a breach, misconfiguration, or physical access—they could potentially recover plaintext passwords offline using computational attacks. This is a local-origin threat that requires the attacker to already have obtained the password hash file, but once in hand, the weak protection mechanism makes password recovery feasible without further network access to the system.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 5.6 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-328
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-07-01 / 2026-07-01
NVD description (verbatim)
The Control-M/Enterprise Manager uses weak protections for stored hashes of account passwords, potentially allowing offline password recovery attacks if credential data is obtained by an attacker. This vulnerability affects Control-M/Enterprise Manager unsupported versions 9.0.20.x and potentially earlier unsupported versions
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2026-10540 involves the use of inadequate password hashing mechanisms in Control-M/Enterprise Manager's credential storage. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-328 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values), indicating that the hashing algorithm or its implementation does not provide sufficient entropy or computational difficulty to resist offline brute-force or dictionary attacks. An attacker with read access to the password storage location can mount offline cryptanalysis to recover plaintext credentials. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L) reflects local attack vector, high privilege requirement, confidentiality impact, and limited integrity and availability impact.
Business impact
Compromise of Control-M/Enterprise Manager credentials could allow an authenticated attacker to escalate privileges or move laterally within the Control-M environment to tamper with job scheduling, data processing workflows, and business-critical automation. Depending on the organization's reliance on Control-M for production workflows, an attacker with administrative credentials could disrupt service availability, modify or exfiltrate sensitive data managed by Control-M jobs, or establish persistence. The threat is elevated in environments where Control-M integrates with financial systems, data warehouses, or compliance-sensitive processes.
Affected systems
Control-M/Enterprise Manager versions 9.0.20.x and potentially earlier unsupported versions are affected. Version 9.0.20.x is explicitly confirmed; organizations running any earlier version in the 9.x series should verify their exact build number against vendor advisories and assume risk unless confirmed patched. Support status should be verified with BMC Software, as unsupported versions may not receive fixes.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires an attacker to first obtain the password hash file, necessitating local or authenticated access, database breach, or backup file exposure. The attack itself is then fully offline and does not require network connectivity or user interaction. Once hashes are obtained, the weak cryptographic protection makes password recovery practical using standard password recovery tools and commodity computing resources. The high privilege requirement in the CVSS vector indicates that initial compromise of a high-privilege account or system access is the primary barrier; the vulnerability itself is not network-exploitable.
Remediation
Organizations using Control-M/Enterprise Manager 9.0.20.x should immediately verify their version and contact BMC Software for patch availability and upgrade guidance. Unsupported versions should be prioritized for upgrade to a currently maintained release. Until patching is possible, implement strict access controls on the Control-M credential database files and audit logs, restrict local access to Enterprise Manager systems, and enable encryption at rest for credential storage. Consider enforcing regular password rotation and monitoring for unauthorized access attempts to the credential repository.
Patch guidance
Verify your exact Control-M/Enterprise Manager version against BMC Software's security advisories. Patch availability depends on the specific version and BMC's current support policy. Unsupported versions (9.0.20.x and earlier) may not receive patches; upgrade to a supported release. Test patches in a non-production environment before deployment to ensure compatibility with dependent systems and job workflows. Coordinate patching with change management to minimize disruption to scheduled jobs.
Detection guidance
Monitor for unauthorized access to Control-M/Enterprise Manager configuration and credential storage directories. Enable and review audit logs for failed authentication attempts, privilege escalation, and changes to user accounts or job definitions. Detect suspicious use of Control-M utilities or APIs that could indicate use of compromised credentials. Perform hash analysis on stored credentials if you can safely extract them in a test environment to confirm whether weak hashing is present. Monitor for offline password cracking activity on networks hosting Control-M systems, though such activity may be difficult to detect if occurring on external systems.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is moderate (5.6), the vulnerability directly threatens administrative credential confidentiality in a system that controls business workflows and automation. Unsupported version status means no future security updates are likely. Organizations relying on Control-M for critical processes should prioritize remediation to reduce the window of exposure, especially if the system stores or processes sensitive data or manages access to downstream systems.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.6 (MEDIUM) reflects local attack vector, requiring high privilege or prior credential compromise, but results in high confidentiality impact (full recovery of plaintext passwords) and limited integrity and availability impact. The score does not account for the business criticality of Control-M in many organizations or the organizational risk of widespread credential compromise; risk should be contextualized based on your environment's dependency on Control-M and the sensitivity of downstream systems it manages.
Frequently asked questions
Can this vulnerability be exploited remotely over the network?
No. The CVSS vector specifies local attack vector (AV:L), meaning the attacker must first obtain the password hash file through local access, database breach, backup file exposure, or prior system compromise. The password recovery attack itself is then offline and does not require network access.
What does 'unsupported version' mean for patching?
Unsupported versions have exited BMC Software's maintenance lifecycle and typically do not receive security patches. Version 9.0.20.x is explicitly identified as unsupported. Organizations must upgrade to a currently supported release to receive security fixes. Verify with BMC Software which versions are currently in support.
If we upgrade Control-M/Enterprise Manager, will our existing Control-M jobs continue to run without modification?
Upgrade compatibility depends on the version gap and your specific job configurations. Verify compatibility in BMC Software's release notes and test thoroughly in a non-production environment before deploying to production. Coordinate the upgrade with your change management process and business continuity team.
How can we reduce risk while we plan our upgrade?
Implement strict access controls on Control-M system directories and credential storage files, restrict local login access to Enterprise Manager servers, enforce strong passwords for remaining local accounts, enable encryption at rest for stored credentials if available, and audit all access to the credential database. Monitor for suspicious authentication or job manipulation activity.
This analysis is provided for educational and defensive purposes. The information reflects publicly disclosed vulnerability details as of the publication date. Verify all patch versions, affected product builds, and vendor guidance directly with BMC Software advisories before making deployment decisions. Organizational risk depends on your specific Control-M version, deployment architecture, and business criticality; consult your security team for risk assessment aligned to your environment. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided or endorsed. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-09. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10814MEDIUMWeak Hash Implementation in Milvus Grantee ID Handler
- CVE-2026-11479MEDIUMWeak Hash in grepai Qdrant Backend – Detection & Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-13455MEDIUMPostgreSQL Anonymizer Salt Extraction via Hash Function Abuse
- CVE-2026-54266MEDIUMAngular HttpTransferCache Hash Collision Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10766LOWMLRun DataFrame Hash Weakness (CVSS 3.6)
- CVE-2026-10783LOWWeak Hash in Gradio Audio Cache – Risk Assessment & Patching Guide
- CVE-2026-10800LOWPaddlePaddle FastDeploy Weak Hash Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-10801LOWWeak Hash in ModelScope ms-swift PIL Image Cache