MEDIUM 6.3

CVE-2026-10302: SQL Injection in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in itsourcecode Fees Management System version 1.0 within the /manage_fee.php file. An authenticated attacker can manipulate the ID parameter to inject malicious SQL commands, potentially allowing unauthorized access to, modification of, or deletion of database records. The vulnerability requires valid user credentials to exploit but can be triggered remotely over the network.

Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain

CVSS
3.1 · 6.3 MEDIUM · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Weaknesses (CWE)
CWE-74, CWE-89
Affected products
0 configuration(s)
Published / Modified
2026-06-02 / 2026-06-17

NVD description (verbatim)

A flaw has been found in itsourcecode Fees Management System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /manage_fee.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.

6 reference(s) · View on NVD →

SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source

Technical summary

CVE-2026-10302 is a SQL injection flaw (CWE-89) stemming from improper input validation (CWE-74) in an unspecified function of /manage_fee.php. The ID parameter is not properly sanitized before being incorporated into SQL queries. An attacker with valid authentication credentials can craft a malicious ID value to break out of the intended query context and execute arbitrary SQL commands. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 (Medium) reflects the requirement for prior authentication; without it, the attack surface is eliminated. The network-accessible nature of the web application means exploitation can occur from any location.

Business impact

Successful exploitation could result in unauthorized disclosure of sensitive fee records, student information, payment details, or other confidential data stored in the application database. Attackers could also modify or delete records, disrupting billing processes, academic records, or fee tracking. While the MEDIUM severity score suggests limited immediate damage compared to critical vulnerabilities, a compromised fees management system can erode institutional trust and trigger compliance violations (FERPA, data protection regulations).

Affected systems

itsourcecode Fees Management System version 1.0 is affected. Organizations running this specific version in production environments are at risk if any user accounts have been compromised or if insider threats are a concern. Cloud or self-hosted deployments of this system are equally vulnerable.

Exploitability

The vulnerability is exploitable but not trivial. It requires an authenticated user session, meaning the attacker must either possess or compromise valid credentials. However, public disclosure and available proof-of-concept code lower the barrier to exploitation. Common weak credential management (shared accounts, default passwords) could enable attackers to gain initial access. Once authenticated, crafting SQL injection payloads requires moderate technical skill but is well-documented in security literature.

Remediation

The primary remediation is to upgrade to a patched version of itsourcecode Fees Management System. Verify against the vendor's official advisory for the specific version number. Pending patching, implement input validation on the ID parameter using allowlists (e.g., accept only numeric values if IDs are numeric), employ parameterized queries or prepared statements in the application code, and enforce the principle of least privilege on database accounts used by the application. Additionally, enforce strong credential policies and monitor authentication logs for suspicious activity.

Patch guidance

Contact itsourcecode for patch availability and version information, as no specific patched version is identified in current advisories. Apply updates through the vendor's official channels. Test patches in a staging environment before production deployment to ensure compatibility with dependent systems. Document the patch version applied for audit and compliance purposes.

Detection guidance

Monitor application logs for SQL syntax errors or unusual query patterns in /manage_fee.php requests. Network intrusion detection systems can flag suspicious SQL keywords (UNION, SELECT, OR 1=1, etc.) in URL parameters. Database activity monitoring (DAM) tools should alert on unexpected command execution or privilege escalation attempts. Review access logs for authenticated users accessing the /manage_fee.php endpoint with unusual ID parameter values. Implement Web Application Firewalls (WAF) with SQL injection signatures to block malicious requests at the perimeter.

Why prioritize this

While the CVSS score is MEDIUM, this vulnerability should be prioritized because: (1) public exploit code exists, lowering barriers to attack; (2) it targets a core financial system, impacting data integrity and institutional operations; (3) unauthorized data access could trigger regulatory incidents; (4) authentication requirement narrows but does not eliminate risk, particularly in environments with weak credential controls. Organizations should patch within 30 days.

Risk score, explained

The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 (MEDIUM) reflects: Network Accessible (AV:N) — exploitable remotely; Low Complexity (AC:L) — no special conditions needed; Requires Logged-In User (PR:L) — authentication is mandatory; No User Interaction (UI:N) — automatic once authenticated; Limited Scope (S:U) — impact confined to the vulnerable component; Low Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability Impact (C:L/I:L/A:L) — data can be read, modified, or deleted but not with catastrophic system-wide effect. The authentication requirement prevents a critical rating; however, the scope of impact on financial data justifies close monitoring.

Frequently asked questions

Can this vulnerability be exploited without user credentials?

No. The CVSS vector explicitly requires PR:L (Privileges Required: Low), meaning valid authentication is mandatory. An attacker must have legitimate or compromised user access to the Fees Management System to exploit this flaw.

What is the difference between this SQL injection and other remote code execution vulnerabilities?

SQL injection allows attackers to manipulate database queries but does not directly grant system-level code execution. The impact is confined to database operations: reading, modifying, or deleting records. However, in some database configurations, stored procedures or advanced SQL features could be leveraged for broader impact. This remains a serious flaw but is categorized as MEDIUM rather than CRITICAL because it does not grant unauthenticated remote access or OS-level control.

Is there a workaround if we cannot patch immediately?

Pending a vendor patch, implement input validation to allow only expected ID formats (e.g., numeric-only if IDs are integers), use parameterized SQL queries in the code, restrict database account permissions to read-only or limited write access where possible, and enforce strong password policies. A Web Application Firewall (WAF) with SQL injection rules can provide defense-in-depth. However, these are mitigations, not solutions—patching should remain the priority.

Does itsourcecode have a bug bounty or coordinated disclosure program?

Information about vendor bug bounty or disclosure programs was not identified in current vulnerability databases. Contact the vendor directly through official channels for the most current patch status and security contact information.

This analysis is provided for informational purposes to support security decision-making. SEC.co does not conduct independent verification of vulnerability claims or patch effectiveness. Organizations must validate all technical recommendations against their specific environment and vendor documentation. Patch versions, availability dates, and workarounds should be confirmed directly with itsourcecode. No exploit code or detailed attack steps are provided here. Use of publicly disclosed exploits should comply with applicable laws and organizational policies. SEC.co assumes no liability for business decisions made based on this analysis. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).