CVE-2025-68052: Unauthenticated CSRF in Eagle Booking ≤1.3.4.3 – Patch Guidance
Eagle Booking versions 1.3.4.3 and earlier contain an unauthenticated Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows attackers to trick users into performing unwanted actions within the application without their knowledge or consent. Because no authentication is required to exploit this flaw, any attacker can craft a malicious webpage or email that, when visited by a logged-in Eagle Booking user, silently executes actions like modifying bookings, changing settings, or deleting data on the victim's behalf.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 8.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-352
- Affected products
- 0 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-26 / 2026-06-26
NVD description (verbatim)
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Eagle Booking <= 1.3.4.3 versions.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
The vulnerability exists because Eagle Booking fails to implement adequate CSRF protections, such as anti-CSRF tokens or SameSite cookie attributes, on state-changing operations. An attacker can forge HTTP requests that exploit the trust relationship between a user's browser and the Eagle Booking application. The flaw is classified as CWE-352 (Cross-Site Request Forgery) and requires user interaction—specifically, the victim must be logged into Eagle Booking when they visit the attacker's crafted page—but no special authentication credentials are needed from the attacker's perspective. The high CVSS score (8.8) reflects the combination of network accessibility, low attack complexity, and the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of user data and booking records.
Business impact
Organizations using Eagle Booking face risks of unauthorized booking modifications, cancellations, or deletions that disrupt business operations and customer trust. Attackers could alter critical booking data, potentially leading to overbooking, financial discrepancies, and customer service failures. The integrity and confidentiality of customer information tied to bookings may be compromised. Given that this affects all versions up to 1.3.4.3, any unpatched deployment is immediately at risk and should be considered a priority remediation target.
Affected systems
Eagle Booking application versions 1.3.4.3 and earlier are vulnerable. The advisory does not specify which deployment models (cloud, on-premise, SaaS) are affected, so assume all installations are in scope. Any organization running an unpatched version of Eagle Booking should assess whether user accounts are exposed to untrusted network traffic or social engineering vectors.
Exploitability
Exploitation is straightforward and requires minimal attacker effort. The attacker needs only to craft a malicious webpage or email containing a forged request and trick a logged-in user into visiting it—no prior account compromise or special tools are necessary. The reliance on user interaction (clicking a link, viewing an image, or visiting a site) is the primary barrier, but phishing or social engineering can overcome this easily. Given the prevalence of CSRF attack tooling and the simplicity of the attack pattern, this vulnerability should be assumed to be exploitable in the wild.
Remediation
Upgrade Eagle Booking to a version newer than 1.3.4.3 as soon as a patched release is available from the vendor. Verify the exact patch version against the official Eagle Booking security advisories. In the interim, apply defense-in-depth measures: enforce SameSite cookie policies at the application or web server level, implement network-level access controls to restrict who can reach the application, and educate users to avoid clicking untrusted links while logged into Eagle Booking. Consider running Eagle Booking behind a reverse proxy that can add anti-CSRF headers if the application itself does not support them natively.
Patch guidance
Contact the Eagle Booking vendor or monitor their official security advisories for a patch version that addresses CWE-352. Apply the patch immediately upon availability to all production and staging environments. Before patching, conduct a full audit of booking records and user activities to detect any unauthorized changes that may have occurred. Test the patched version in a non-production environment to confirm compatibility with your deployment and any custom integrations before rollout.
Detection guidance
Monitor application logs for suspicious booking modifications or deletions that lack corresponding user actions or API calls initiated by the affected user's own session. Look for state-changing requests (POST, PUT, DELETE) that originate from unexpected referrer headers or from third-party domains. Implement or enhance logging of HTTP referer headers and request origins. Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to detect and block requests with missing or anomalous anti-CSRF tokens if the application supports token validation. Monitor for unusual user-agent patterns or simultaneous requests from the same user across multiple sessions.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits immediate attention due to its high CVSS score, low attack complexity, and direct impact on data integrity. The requirement for user interaction is mitigated by the ease of social engineering in a booking context where users may receive legitimate-looking booking confirmation emails. The unauthenticated nature amplifies risk—any attacker, regardless of account status, can launch an attack. Organizations with user-facing booking systems or those handling high-volume transactions should prioritize patching within days, not weeks.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 8.8 HIGH score reflects a network-accessible vulnerability with low attack complexity (no special conditions required), no privilege requirement, and no specialized access. The attack requires user interaction, which moderately reduces severity but does not change the rating significantly. High impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability stems from the ability to modify or delete booking data, exposing sensitive customer information and disrupting business operations. This is a standard CVSS 3.1 calculation for a well-scoped CSRF flaw.
Frequently asked questions
Can an attacker exploit this vulnerability without the user being logged into Eagle Booking?
No. The vulnerability requires the victim to be an authenticated user with an active session in Eagle Booking. The attacker cannot forge requests on behalf of a user who is not logged in. However, this is a low bar—any user who visits a malicious site while logged into Eagle Booking in another tab is at risk.
How can we detect if we've been exploited?
Review Eagle Booking logs for booking modifications, cancellations, or deletions that do not correspond to user-initiated actions or administrator requests. Look for changes during unusual times or from users with no clear operational need to make them. If you maintain audit trails of booking changes, cross-reference them with user activity logs and IP addresses. Unexplained changes are a red flag.
What if we cannot patch immediately?
Implement compensating controls: enforce SameSite=Strict on session cookies, restrict network access to Eagle Booking to internal IP ranges only, use a WAF to block requests with suspicious referrer headers, and educate staff not to click untrusted links while logged into the booking system. These are temporary measures and not a substitute for patching.
Does this vulnerability expose customer data directly?
The vulnerability itself is a CSRF flaw, not a data disclosure vulnerability. However, by allowing an attacker to modify or delete bookings, it can indirectly expose or compromise customer information tied to those bookings (names, contact details, preferences). Integrity is the primary concern, but confidentiality may also be affected depending on what information is logged or visible in booking records.
This analysis is based on published CVE data and general cybersecurity principles. Specific patch availability, affected product configurations, and vendor response timelines should be verified directly with Eagle Booking's official security advisories and documentation. SEC.co does not provide legal or compliance advice; consult your security and legal teams regarding remediation deadlines and regulatory obligations. No exploit code or weaponized proof-of-concept is provided or endorsed in this analysis. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-08-05. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Weaknesses (CWE)
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-11265HIGHGoogle Chrome Autofill Cross-Origin Data Leak (CVSS 7.5)
- CVE-2026-12158HIGHRegistrationMagic CSRF Privilege Escalation Vulnerability – WordPress Plugin Security
- CVE-2026-12740HIGHOAuth 2.0 State Parameter Missing in Plack::Middleware::OAuth – Account Takeover Risk
- CVE-2026-12746HIGHDancer2 OAuth 2.0 State Parameter Missing – Account Takeover Risk
- CVE-2026-15070HIGHSalon Booking System WordPress Plugin Remote Code Execution via CSRF
- CVE-2026-22342HIGHWordPress Dating Theme CSRF Vulnerability – High-Risk Patch Required
- CVE-2026-34171HIGHCoolify Password Reset CSRF Vulnerability (v4.0.0-beta.470 and Earlier)
- CVE-2026-35266HIGHOracle REST Data Services Authentication & Data Integrity Vulnerability