CVE-2025-62850: QNAP QuTS hero NULL Pointer Dereference DoS Vulnerability
A NULL pointer dereference flaw in QNAP QuTS hero operating system can allow an administrator account holder to crash the storage system, causing service interruption. The vulnerability requires valid admin credentials to exploit, limiting its immediate exposure to insider threats or compromised admin accounts. QNAP has released patched versions across multiple QuTS hero branches.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.2 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-476
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-10 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 and later QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later QuTS hero h6.0.0.3459 build 20260409 and later
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2025-62850 is a NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476) in QNAP QuTS hero that permits a high-privileged user to trigger a denial-of-service condition by dereferencing a null memory pointer, likely through a specific API call or admin interface function. The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 reflects the requirement for administrator privileges (PR:H), network accessibility, and the broad impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H). The latter suggests the crash may expose sensitive data or require manual recovery intervention beyond simple service restart.
Business impact
Organizations relying on QNAP QuTS hero systems face potential data center downtime if a malicious or compromised administrator account is used to trigger this vulnerability. Unlike remote code execution flaws, this requires legitimate credentials, but the impact is measured in service unavailability, potential data consistency issues during uncontrolled shutdown, and recovery time. For mission-critical backup and archival appliances, even brief outages can disrupt backup windows and disaster recovery testing.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects QuTS hero across multiple major versions. Patches are available in QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 and later, QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later, and QuTS hero h6.0.0.3459 build 20260409 and later. Organizations running earlier builds of these branches, or using other QuTS hero versions not listed in the patch guidance, remain vulnerable and should verify their build numbers against QNAP's official advisory.
Exploitability
Exploitability is constrained by the requirement for administrator account access. This is not a remote, unauthenticated vulnerability; it assumes either a compromised admin credential, insider threat, or intentional misuse by a privileged user. The low complexity (AC:L) indicates straightforward triggering once credentials are obtained, but the high privilege bar (PR:H) prevents mass exploitation from external threat actors without prior account compromise. The vulnerability is not known to be actively exploited in the wild or included in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
Remediation
Update affected QuTS hero systems to the patched builds immediately. Verify your current build number in the system settings and cross-reference against the three fixed versions provided. If you cannot update to a patched version immediately, enforce strict access controls on administrator accounts, disable unnecessary admin interfaces, and monitor account activity logs for suspicious access patterns. Implement network segmentation to limit direct administrative access to QuTS hero appliances.
Patch guidance
Apply updates from QNAP as follows: QuTS hero h5.2.9 users should update to build 20260214 or later; h5.3.4 users to build 20260520 or later; h6.0.0 users to build 20260409 or later. Test patches in a non-production environment first, particularly in backup-critical deployments where downtime during patching is costly. Schedule patching during a maintenance window and have a rollback plan if the update process is interrupted. Consult QNAP's official security advisory and release notes for detailed upgrade steps specific to your hardware model.
Detection guidance
Monitor QNAP admin interface logs and audit trails for unusual API calls or function invocations by administrator accounts, particularly around features that might interact with memory management or system-level operations. Configure alerts for unexpected system crashes or ungraceful service restarts on QuTS hero appliances. Implement centralized logging for all admin account activity if your security monitoring infrastructure supports integration with QNAP systems. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions on administrative endpoints used to access these systems may detect lateral movement or credential theft that precedes exploitation.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is 7.2 (HIGH), this vulnerability's real-world priority depends on your admin account hygiene and insider risk profile. Organizations with strict administrator access controls and robust credential management should address this in a planned patching cycle. However, those with broader admin privileges, contractor access, or weak credential rotation practices should treat this as urgent because a single compromised admin account can immediately render critical storage systems unavailable. The lack of KEV status indicates no known active exploitation, reducing immediate external threat pressure.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 reflects the combination of network attack surface (AV:N), straightforward exploitation once admin access is obtained (AC:L), essential privilege requirement (PR:H), and broad impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The high severity arises from the complete impact on these three pillars, not because this is an unauthenticated remote code execution. Your internal risk score should be adjusted downward if admin access is tightly controlled, or upward if credential compromise is a realistic threat in your threat model.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to patch immediately if our administrators are carefully vetted and we use multi-factor authentication?
Immediate patching is still warranted because a NULL pointer dereference crash can impact business continuity, and admin credentials can be compromised through phishing or lateral movement even with MFA in place. However, you can schedule patching during a planned maintenance window rather than treating it as an emergency, provided you maintain strong monitoring of admin activity in the interim.
What happens if this vulnerability is exploited—does the system automatically recover or require manual intervention?
The vulnerability causes a denial-of-service crash, meaning the QuTS hero service or the entire appliance may become unresponsive. Automatic recovery depends on your system configuration and monitoring setup. Many organizations require manual intervention to verify system integrity and restart services, which extends downtime. Check your QNAP documentation for automatic restart policies and test them in a lab environment.
Are there workarounds if we cannot update to a patched build immediately?
There is no complete workaround, but you can reduce risk by restricting administrative access to trusted users only, disabling remote admin interfaces if not required, enforcing strong password policies and MFA, and monitoring admin logs for suspicious activity. However, these are temporary mitigations; patching remains the only fix.
How do we know if this vulnerability has been exploited on our systems?
Look for unexpected system crashes, ungraceful shutdowns, or service restarts in your QNAP system logs and audit trails. Cross-reference the timestamps with admin activity logs to identify correlations. If you see crashes immediately after high-privilege user activity (particularly API calls or admin panel actions), escalate for forensic analysis. Implement centralized logging to SIEM if available to establish a historical baseline for normal system behavior.
This analysis is based on the vulnerability advisory published on 2026-06-10 and modified 2026-06-17. CVSS scores and vendor patch information reflect the source data available at publication. Organizations should verify patch version numbers and build dates against QNAP's official security advisory before deployment. This vulnerability is not currently tracked by CISA in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, but that status may change. Consult your vendor documentation and conduct testing in non-production environments before applying patches to mission-critical systems. Security posture varies by organization; adjust your internal risk rating based on your specific administrative access controls, credential hygiene practices, and threat model. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-19. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-66281HIGHQNAP NULL Pointer Dereference DoS Vulnerability (HIGH)
- CVE-2026-24716HIGHQNAP NULL Pointer Dereference DoS Vulnerability – Patch Guidance
- CVE-2026-22899MEDIUMQNAP File Station 6 NULL Pointer Dereference DoS Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-55657HIGHGPAC MP4Box NULL Pointer Dereference Denial of Service
- CVE-2025-59604HIGHQualcomm Snapdragon Memory Corruption Vulnerability – HIGH Severity
- CVE-2025-59606HIGHQualcomm Chipset Memory Corruption Local Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2025-70099HIGHNULL Pointer Dereference in lwext4 Directory Parsing (Denial of Service)
- CVE-2026-3238HIGHSamba WINS Server NULL Pointer Dereference DoS Vulnerability