CVE-2025-62340: HCL iControl Session Timeout Vulnerability – Analysis & Remediation
HCL iControl contains a session management weakness where user sessions are not automatically terminated after periods of inactivity. This means that if a user walks away from an authenticated session without logging out, an attacker with physical or network access could potentially interact with the application under that user's privileges. The vulnerability requires an attacker to have some level of access and be able to reach the application, limiting the immediate threat, but it does increase risk in shared or public-facing deployments.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 3.1 LOW · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-613
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-17 / 2026-06-26
NVD description (verbatim)
HCL iControl was affected by Inadequate Session Timeout vulnerability. The vulnerability involves a security risk where a web application fails to automatically terminate user sessions after a period of inactivity
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2025-62340 addresses an inadequate session timeout implementation in HCL iControl. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-613 (Insufficient Session Expiration) and carries a CVSS v3.1 score of 3.1 (Low severity) with vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N. The attack requires network access, a valid authenticated user context, and relatively high complexity. The impact is limited to potential confidentiality loss without integrity or availability compromise. The session timeout weakness means that indefinitely-held authentication tokens or session identifiers create a window for unauthorized access if a session is abandoned.
Business impact
The primary business risk is unauthorized access to iControl by an attacker exploiting unattended, authenticated sessions. In environments where multiple users share workstations or where iControl is deployed in semi-public areas (e.g., kiosks, shared offices), an attacker could view or potentially exfiltrate application data without re-authenticating. Regulatory frameworks such as PCI-DSS and HIPAA mandate automatic session termination, making this a compliance concern for organizations subject to those standards. The impact is low because exploitation requires valid credentials or physical proximity to an active session, but the control gap itself should be remediated as part of secure session management hygiene.
Affected systems
HCL iControl is the affected product. The vulnerability applies to deployments in which session timeout is not properly enforced. Organizations running iControl should review their deployment to understand which versions are impacted and whether compensating controls (reverse proxy-level session management, network isolation) are in place. Consult the HCL vendor advisory for version-specific impact details.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires an attacker to have legitimate user credentials (PR:L) and network access to iControl, combined with a scenario in which a user's session remains active and unattended. The CVSS attack complexity is high, indicating that the attack path is not trivial; an attacker must either have a valid account and then identify an abandoned session, or gain local/physical access to an unlocked workstation with an active session. No public exploits have been identified (not listed on KEV). Real-world risk is reduced by the need for prior authentication, but the weakness becomes material in high-traffic or shared-access environments.
Remediation
Apply the security patch released by HCL Technologies. Verify the patch version against the official HCL iControl security advisory and deployment documentation. In addition to patching, implement compensating controls: configure web servers or reverse proxies to enforce strict session timeout policies at the infrastructure layer, enable automatic session expiration warnings for users, and educate users to manually log out when leaving a workstation. Monitor authentication and session logs for anomalies that might indicate session reuse.
Patch guidance
Obtain and apply the official security patch from HCL Technologies. Test the patch in a non-production environment to confirm that session timeout behavior is enforced correctly (e.g., verify that idle sessions are terminated after the configured timeout period). Update all iControl instances in your environment. Document the patch version applied and the date of deployment for audit and compliance records. If you are uncertain whether your version is affected, contact HCL support or consult the vendor security advisory.
Detection guidance
Monitor iControl authentication and session logs for signs of session reuse or token replay. Implement alerts for multiple authentication events from the same user within short time windows or from unexpected geographic locations. Track session duration and flag sessions that remain active for unusually long periods. Deploy web application firewalls (WAF) or reverse proxies that can enforce session timeout at the network perimeter. Review access logs for patterns consistent with unattended session exploitation, such as requests from a dormant session after a long idle period.
Why prioritize this
Although the CVSS score is low (3.1), this vulnerability should not be deprioritized entirely. It represents a fundamental session management control gap that, while difficult to exploit, undermines the principle of least privilege and creates compliance risk. Organizations should patch within standard vulnerability management timelines (60–90 days for low-severity issues), but expedite remediation if iControl is deployed in multi-user or public-facing environments where session abandonment is more likely.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS v3.1 score of 3.1 reflects low immediate risk because exploitation requires prior authentication (PR:L), network access, and high attack complexity (AC:H). The impact is confined to confidentiality (C:L) with no integrity or availability impact. However, the control weakness itself is significant from a governance and compliance standpoint. Organizations should evaluate their own risk tolerance based on deployment context: a shared kiosk or multi-user workstation scenario elevates practical risk, while isolated, well-monitored instances reduce it.
Frequently asked questions
Does this vulnerability allow an unauthenticated attacker to access iControl?
No. The vulnerability requires an attacker to have already authenticated or to exploit an active, unattended session. Unauthenticated users cannot directly leverage this weakness. However, once a user walks away from a logged-in workstation, the attacker does not need credentials—they can interact with the application using the abandoned session.
Is this vulnerability listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog?
No, CVE-2025-62340 is not currently on the KEV catalog. There is no evidence of active exploitation in the wild, but organizations should still remediate according to standard vulnerability management practices.
What compensating controls can I implement while waiting for a patch?
Configure network-level session timeout policies via reverse proxies, load balancers, or web application firewalls. Enforce automatic logout warnings on iControl interfaces. Restrict iControl access to specific networks or VPNs to reduce the likelihood of unattended session exposure. Train users to manually log out, especially in shared environments.
Does this vulnerability affect all versions of HCL iControl?
The advisory indicates that HCL iControl is affected, but specific version boundaries are not provided in this summary. Consult the official HCL security advisory to determine which versions are impacted and which patch versions address the issue.
This analysis is provided for informational purposes based on publicly available vulnerability data as of the publication date. Organizations must verify all technical details, including affected versions and patch availability, directly with HCL Technologies' official security advisory before making remediation decisions. CVSS scores and severity ratings reflect a general assessment and may not account for your specific deployment context, network topology, or compliance requirements. No exploitation code or detailed attack vectors are provided. Always test patches in non-production environments before enterprise deployment. SEC.co and its analysts make no warranty regarding the completeness or timeliness of this information. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-27. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-44188MEDIUMAnsible Lightspeed Session Hijacking via Token Non-Revocation
- CVE-2026-44648HIGHSillyTavern Session Expiration Vulnerability – Account Takeover Risk
- CVE-2026-46656HIGHBludit Ghost Session Vulnerability – Broken Access Control Flaw
- CVE-2026-46657HIGHBludit Account Disablement Bypass via Persistent Authentication Tokens
- CVE-2026-48726MEDIUMApache Airflow JWT Token Revocation Bypass in FAB and Keycloak Logout
- CVE-2026-53824MEDIUMOpenClaw Token Revocation Bypass (CVSS 6.5)
- CVE-2026-53830MEDIUMOpenClaw Webhook Secret Revocation Bypass (CVSS 6.5)
- CVE-2026-53843HIGHOpenClaw Authorization Bypass: Pairing-Scoped Session Re-Establishment