CVE-2025-52612: HCL iControl CSV Injection & Reflected XSS Vulnerability – CVSS 7.1
HCL iControl contains a vulnerability that combines CSV injection with reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) in its export function. An authenticated attacker can craft malicious input that, when a user interacts with exported CSV content or follows a specially crafted link, executes arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session. The vulnerability stems from inadequate input validation and sanitization, allowing attackers to inject both CSV formulas and script payloads.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.1 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-1236
- Affected products
- 1 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-04 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
HCL iControl was affected by Export CSV - CSV Injection vulnerability. It is vulnerable to a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability. This was caused by an insufficient sanitation of input parameters. .
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2025-52612 is a reflected XSS vulnerability in HCL iControl's CSV export functionality, classified under CWE-1236 (Insufficient Sanitation of Returned Data). The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied parameters before reflecting them in export responses. An authenticated user with export privileges can inject JavaScript code that executes in the browser context of another user who clicks a malicious link or opens a crafted export file. The vulnerability requires user interaction (UI:R) and authentication (PR:L), but achieves high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact within the user's session scope.
Business impact
This vulnerability enables session hijacking, credential theft, and lateral movement within environments relying on HCL iControl for IT operations management. An insider or compromised account can craft phishing emails with weaponized export links, harvesting credentials or deploying malware across the organization. In multi-tenant deployments, the vulnerability could be exploited to steal sensitive operational data, manipulate system configurations, or disrupt service availability through JavaScript-based attacks. The risk is elevated in organizations where iControl manages critical infrastructure or access controls.
Affected systems
HCL iControl is affected. Determine your installed version against HCL's advisory to confirm exposure. Organizations should inventory all iControl deployments, particularly those exposed to untrusted networks or handling sensitive infrastructure management tasks. The vulnerability requires authentication, limiting exposure to users with valid credentials, but compromised or malicious insiders present a material risk.
Exploitability
Exploitation requires authentication and user interaction—a user must click a malicious link or open a crafted export file. However, the attack vector is network-accessible, and authenticated users are common in IT management tools. Social engineering is straightforward: an attacker sends a link claiming to be a legitimate CSV export, triggering the XSS payload. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R) reflects moderate complexity due to user interaction requirements, but the high impact score (7.1) reflects the potential for credential theft and session compromise. This is not in the CISA KEV catalog, suggesting limited evidence of active exploitation in the wild at publication, but organizations should not rely on this for prioritization.
Remediation
Apply security patches from HCL as soon as they become available. Verify patch version numbers directly against HCL's security advisory. Interim mitigations include restricting iControl access to trusted networks via firewall rules, disabling CSV export functionality if operationally feasible, and educating users not to click suspicious export links from untrusted sources. Implement HTTP security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options) at the application or reverse proxy level to reduce XSS blast radius. Review access logs for suspicious export activity.
Patch guidance
HCL will release patched versions addressing input sanitization in the CSV export module. Consult HCL's official security advisory for exact version numbers and deployment instructions. Test patches in a staging environment before production rollout, particularly if iControl is integrated with critical systems. Prioritize patching instances accessible to external networks or handling sensitive data.
Detection guidance
Monitor application logs for export requests with unusual parameters—look for script tags, event handlers (onclick, onload), or URL-encoded malicious payloads in CSV export URLs. Track XSS-related HTTP status codes and error messages. Use endpoint detection and response (EDR) to flag browser processes spawning unexpected child processes after accessing iControl. Implement web application firewalls (WAF) to block requests containing common XSS patterns in export parameters. Review user access to the export feature and correlate with phishing reports.
Why prioritize this
A CVSS 7.1 HIGH vulnerability in an IT operations tool with authentication and user interaction requirements merits swift but measured prioritization. The absence from the KEV catalog suggests no active mass exploitation, but the attack surface—authenticated users receiving social-engineered links—is realistic in enterprises. Prioritize patching iControl instances managing critical infrastructure, handling privileged access management (PAM), or exposed to high-risk user communities. Lower priority for air-gapped or low-risk iControl instances.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.1 reflects high severity due to complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability within a user's session. The authentication requirement (PR:L) and user interaction (UI:R) prevent a 9+ rating; however, the network-accessible attack vector and the ease of social engineering keep it in the HIGH band. Organizations should weight this against their iControl criticality, user privilege levels, and network exposure.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to patch immediately if iControl is internal and behind a firewall?
Not if network access is strictly controlled to trusted users. However, insider threats and credential compromise remain material risks. Patch within 30 days as part of normal security operations. Prioritize public-facing or DMZ-hosted instances.
Can this vulnerability be exploited without tricking a user into clicking a link?
The vulnerability requires reflected XSS, so a user must click a malicious link or open a crafted CSV file. It is not a stored XSS or CSRF scenario, meaning blind exploitation is unlikely. User-awareness training and email controls are effective interim controls.
What should I look for in security logs to detect exploitation?
Search for export API calls with suspicious query parameters containing '<', '>', 'script', 'onclick', or base64-encoded payloads. Look for unusual CSV exports followed by outbound connections from the affected user's session or alerts from endpoint security tools.
Is this vulnerability included in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog?
No, as of the publication date, CVE-2025-52612 is not in the KEV catalog. This suggests no widespread active exploitation, but does not guarantee zero real-world attacks. Patch based on your risk profile and asset criticality, not KEV status alone.
This analysis is based on publicly disclosed vulnerability data current as of the source publication date. Patch version numbers and detailed remediation steps must be verified against HCL's official security advisory. SEC.co makes no warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness of vendor-supplied patch information. Organizations are responsible for assessing risk within their own environment, including asset criticality, network exposure, and user privileges. Testing patches in a non-production environment is strongly recommended before deployment. This content is for informational purposes and does not constitute security advice or a substitute for professional security consultation. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-10248MEDIUMCSV Injection in SourceCodester Pharmacy Sales and Inventory System
- CVE-2025-52606MEDIUMHCL iControl Weak Input Validation Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-52608LOWHCL iControl Missing Cookie Attributes Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-52609LOWHCL iControl Missing Security Headers XSS Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-52611LOWHCL iControl Stack Trace Disclosure (v4.0.0)
- CVE-2018-25382HIGHZechat 1.5 SQL Injection Vulnerability – Unauthenticated Database Access
- CVE-2018-25383HIGHFree MP3 CD Ripper 2.8 Stack Overflow – ROP and DEP Bypass Risk
- CVE-2018-25385HIGHUnauthenticated SQL Injection in E-Registrasi Pencak Silat 18.10