CVE-2025-48652: Android MDM Bypass Logic Flaw – HIGH Severity Privilege Escalation
A logic flaw in Android's application installation validation code allows a local attacker to bypass Mobile Device Management (MDM) security policies. An attacker with local access to the device can exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges without requiring additional permissions or user interaction. MDM policies are a key security control for organizations managing corporate Android devices, making this bypass a significant concern for enterprise environments.
Source data · NVD / CISA · public domain
- CVSS
- 3.1 · 7.8 HIGH · CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weaknesses (CWE)
- CWE-693
- Affected products
- 5 configuration(s)
- Published / Modified
- 2026-06-01 / 2026-06-17
NVD description (verbatim)
In performPreInstallChecks of InstallRepository.kt, there is a possible way to bypass MDM policy due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
1 reference(s) · View on NVD →
SEC.co analysis · AI-assisted, reviewed against source
Technical summary
CVE-2025-48652 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Android's InstallRepository.kt file, specifically in the performPreInstallChecks function. The vulnerability stems from a logic error that fails to properly validate application installation requests against MDM policies. An attacker with local (low-privilege) user context can trigger this flaw during the application installation process, circumventing MDM restrictions that would normally prevent unauthorized software deployment. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure), indicating a breakdown in the security validation logic. With a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (HIGH severity), the vulnerability carries a vector of AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reflecting local attack surface, low attack complexity, low privilege requirements, and complete impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Business impact
For organizations relying on MDM solutions to enforce security policies on Android devices, this vulnerability represents a direct threat to device governance. Employees or compromised accounts with local device access could install unauthorized applications, access restricted functionality, or modify system behavior despite MDM policies. In BYOD or corporate-managed scenarios, this could lead to data exfiltration, installation of surveillance or credential-harvesting malware, or circumvention of security applications (e.g., VPN clients, endpoint detection tools). The no-interaction requirement amplifies risk—exploitation can occur through automated scripts or malware already present on the device.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects multiple versions of Google Android. Organizations using Android devices with MDM management should verify the specific patch status for their deployed Android versions. Verify against the vendor advisory from Google for the exact affected version ranges and corresponding patched releases.
Exploitability
Exploitability is high due to low barriers to entry. An attacker needs only local access to the device (achievable if the device is unlocked, already compromised, or accessible via USB debugging). The attack complexity is low—no race conditions, timing dependencies, or environmental quirks are required. User interaction is not needed, meaning the vulnerability could be triggered programmatically by malware or automated tools. The primary constraint is obtaining initial local access, but once present, the flaw provides a direct path to privilege escalation and MDM bypass.
Remediation
Apply the security patch provided by Google for your affected Android version. Patch availability and version numbers should be verified against Google's official Android security bulletin. In the interim, organizations should reinforce physical device security controls, enforce strong device unlock mechanisms, disable USB debugging in production environments, and monitor for suspicious application installations that deviate from MDM policies. MDM solutions should be configured to alert on installation anomalies.
Patch guidance
Consult Google's Android security bulletin (dated around June 2026 based on the modification date) for the specific patched Android versions corresponding to your deployment. Apply the patch through standard Android updates on affected devices. Test patches in a controlled environment before rolling out to production, particularly for critical business-use devices. Prioritize devices frequently connected to sensitive corporate networks or containing access to high-value data.
Detection guidance
Monitor for applications installed on corporate devices that conflict with MDM policy allowlists. Enable MDM logging and alerting for installation attempts that bypass established policies. On the device level, check installation logs and package manager activity for unexpected application installations or attempts to install packages from non-standard sources. Consider deploying behavioral monitoring to detect patterns consistent with privilege escalation attempts during the installation process. Log analysis should focus on the InstallRepository component behavior if device-level forensics are available.
Why prioritize this
This vulnerability merits high priority for organizations with Android MDM deployments because it directly undermines a foundational security control. The combination of local attack surface, no user interaction requirement, complete impact to confidentiality/integrity/availability, and the strategic importance of MDM policies in enterprise environments creates compelling risk. The CVSS 7.8 score and the absence of KEV designation (as of the source data) should not lower urgency—MDM bypass is intrinsically high-risk regardless of public exploit availability.
Risk score, explained
The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 reflects: (1) local attack vector (device must already be accessible), (2) low attack complexity (no special conditions), (3) low privilege requirements (standard user context), (4) no user interaction, (5) unchanged security scope, and (6) high impact to all three security properties. This high score is justified given the complete compromise of device integrity and confidentiality, combined with the fundamental failure of MDM policy enforcement. Organizations should treat this as a HIGH-severity issue and prioritize patching accordingly.
Frequently asked questions
What is MDM and why does bypassing it matter?
Mobile Device Management (MDM) is enterprise software that enforces security policies on corporate-managed devices—controlling which applications can be installed, enabling remote wipe, enforcing encryption, and monitoring compliance. Bypassing MDM policies allows an attacker to install malware, access restricted resources, or disable security controls, effectively neutering an organization's ability to govern device security.
Do I need to already be an admin to exploit this?
No. The vulnerability requires only local user-level access to the device. You do not need system administrator privileges or special execution capabilities. This makes it more dangerous because a standard user account, or any malware running under a standard user context, can trigger the exploit.
Is this a zero-day or has it been actively exploited?
Based on the available data, this vulnerability is not listed in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog as of the source information. However, the absence of KEV listing does not guarantee lack of exploitation. Organizations should treat it as a credible threat and prioritize patching independently of KEV status.
Can MDM solutions detect or block this attack?
A well-configured MDM platform should be able to detect unexpected or policy-violating application installations through its monitoring and alerting systems. However, MDM's ability to prevent the exploit depends on whether the baseline MDM policy validation is enforced before this vulnerability is triggered. Organizations should review their MDM platform's handling of the affected Android versions and apply patches promptly to ensure full policy enforcement is restored.
This analysis is based on vulnerability data as of the modification date (2026-06-17) and source advisory information. Specific patch versions, affected version ranges, and availability timelines should be verified against Google's official Android Security & Privacy Year in Review or corresponding security bulletins. Organizations must conduct their own risk assessment and testing in their environment. SEC.co provides this information for informational purposes; consult official vendor advisories and your MDM vendor for authoritative guidance on remediation and compatibility. Source: NVD (public-domain), retrieved 2026-07-07. Analysis generated by SEC.co (claude-haiku-4-5).
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2025-48649HIGHAndroid Local Privilege Escalation via Permission Bypass
- CVE-2026-0045HIGHAndroid Bluetooth Bonding Bypass Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-0077HIGHAndroid ActivityRecord Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-0087HIGHAndroid App Link Hijacking via Domain Verification Logic Error
- CVE-2026-0097HIGHAndroid Bluetooth Pairing Logic Error Allows Silent Privilege Escalation
- CVE-2026-10944MEDIUMChrome iOS Autofill Data Leak Vulnerability – Patch Now
- CVE-2026-10950MEDIUMChrome iOS Autofill Data Leak Vulnerability – Patch Guide
- CVE-2025-52609LOWHCL iControl Missing Security Headers XSS Vulnerability