NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0
Six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. We use the CSF as the default program structure for clients who don't have a specific regulatory mandate.
Cybersecurity is a regulated discipline. Engagements typically reference one or more of the frameworks below — for control selection, audit alignment, or executive communication. This page is the index.
Control catalogs and program structures we use to design and operate security programs.
Six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. We use the CSF as the default program structure for clients who don't have a specific regulatory mandate.
Control catalog underlying FedRAMP, FISMA, and many state programs. We implement at Low, Moderate, and High baselines.
110 controls for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in non-federal systems. Required by DFARS and the precursor to CMMC.
18 control families organized into three implementation groups. Pragmatic baseline that pairs well with NIST CSF.
Cybersecurity for industrial automation and control systems. The reference framework for manufacturing, energy, and utilities clients.
Required for procurement, sales, or law. Each links to the dedicated compliance page where applicable.
Three-level maturity model required for DoD contracts touching CUI. Built on NIST 800-171.
Authorization for cloud-service providers selling into the federal government.
AICPA Trust Services Criteria. The de facto B2B sales requirement for SaaS.
Information Security Management System certification. Required outside the U.S. and increasingly in U.S. enterprise procurement.
Required for covered entities and business associates touching PHI in the U.S.
Required by the card brands for any system handling, processing, or transmitting cardholder data.
EU regulation governing personal data processing. Applies to U.S. companies handling EU residents' data.
How we describe attacker behavior, design detections, and threat-model applications.
The reference taxonomy for adversary behavior. We map detection coverage and threat-hunting hypotheses to ATT&CK techniques.
Companion to ATT&CK. We use D3FEND to map controls to the adversary techniques they actually disrupt.
Lockheed Martin model of an intrusion lifecycle. Older than ATT&CK but still useful for executive narrative.
Threat-categorization model used for application threat modeling: Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information disclosure, DoS, Elevation of privilege.